Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Dec 13;108(5):djv377.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv377. Print 2016 May.

TERT Promoter Mutations and Risk of Recurrence in Meningioma

Affiliations
Comparative Study

TERT Promoter Mutations and Risk of Recurrence in Meningioma

Felix Sahm et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) classification and grading system attempts to predict the clinical course of meningiomas based on morphological parameters. However, because of high interobserver variation of some criteria, more reliable prognostic markers are required. Here, we assessed the TERT promoter for mutations in the hotspot regions C228T and C250T in meningioma samples from 252 patients. Mutations were detected in 16 samples (6.4% across the cohort, 1.7%, 5.7%, and 20.0% of WHO grade I, II, and III cases, respectively). Data were analyzed by t test, Fisher's exact test, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard model. All statistical tests were two-sided. Within a mean follow-up time in surviving patients of 68.1 months, TERT promoter mutations were statistically significantly associated with shorter time to progression (P < .001). Median time to progression among mutant cases was 10.1 months compared with 179.0 months among wild-type cases. Our results indicate that the inclusion of molecular data (ie, analysis of TERT promoter status) into a histologically and genetically integrated classification and grading system for meningiomas increases prognostic power. Consequently, we propose to incorporate the assessment of TERT promoter status in upcoming grading schemes for meningioma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan-Meier plots of time to progression in TERT promoter mutant vs wild-type samples (A) and World Health Organization (WHO) grade I-III vs TERT mutant (B). Tables below plots indicate patients at risk at time points 0, 100, and 225 months. All statistical tests were two-sided Brier prediction plot of WHO grading vs TERT status. The reference group is the marginal Kaplan-Meier prediction model (C). mut = mutant; WHO = World Health Organization; wt = wild-type.

References

    1. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114(2):97–109. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Domingues PH, Sousa P, Otero A, et al. Proposal for a new risk stratification classification for meningioma based on patient age, WHO tumor grade, size, localization, and karyotype. Neuro Oncol. 2014;16(5):735–747. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeAngelis LM. Brain tumors. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(2):114–123. - PubMed
    1. Olar A, Wani KM, Sulman EP, et al. Mitotic Index is an Independent Predictor of Recurrence-Free Survival in Meningioma. Brain Pathol. 2015;25(3):266–275. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang FW, Hodis E, Xu MJ, et al. Highly recurrent TERT promoter mutations in human melanoma. Science. 2013;339(6122):957–959. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms