Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;31(3):579-85.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2465-6. Epub 2015 Dec 15.

Current use of diverting stoma in anterior resection for cancer: population-based cohort study of total and partial mesorectal excision

Affiliations

Current use of diverting stoma in anterior resection for cancer: population-based cohort study of total and partial mesorectal excision

Martin Rutegård et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: A diverting stoma is commonly used to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage when performing total mesorectal excision (TME) in anterior resection for rectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of fecal diversion in relation to partial mesorectal excision (PME).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was undertaken on a national cohort, originally created to study the impact of central arterial ligation on patients with increased cardiovascular risk. Some 741 patients operated with anterior resection for rectal cancer during the years 2007 through 2010 were followed up for 53 months. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the impact of diverting stoma on the risk of anastomotic leakage and permanent stoma, expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: The risk of anastomotic leakage was increased in TME surgery when not using a diverting stoma (OR 5.1; 95% CI 2.2-11.6), while the corresponding risk increase in PME patients was modest (OR 1.8; 95% CI 0.8-4.0). At study completion or death, 26 and 13% of TME and PME patients, respectively, had a permanent stoma. A diverting stoma was a statistically significant risk factor for a permanent stoma in PME patients (OR 4.7; 95% CI 2.5-9.0), while less important in TME patients (OR 1.8; 95% CI 0.6-5.5).

Conclusion: The benefit of a diverting stoma concerning anastomotic leakage in this patient group seems doubtful. Moreover, the diverting stoma itself may contribute to the high rate of permanent stomas.

Keywords: Defunctioning stoma; Fecal diversion; Permanent stoma; Rectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Epidemiology. 2011 Sep;22(5):745 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Jan;54(1):41-7 - PubMed
    1. BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 09;11:450 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 May;218(5):940-9 - PubMed
    1. Colorectal Dis. 2010 May;12(5):428-32 - PubMed

Publication types