Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 May 4;13(1):dose-response.14-025.Mitchel.
doi: 10.2203/dose-response.14-025.Mitchel. eCollection 2015 Jan-Mar.

Adaption By Low Dose Radiation Exposure: A Look at Scope and Limitations for Radioprotection

Affiliations
Review

Adaption By Low Dose Radiation Exposure: A Look at Scope and Limitations for Radioprotection

Ron E J Mitchel. Dose Response. .

Abstract

The procedures and dose limitations used for radiation protection in the nuclear industry are founded on the assumption that risk is directly proportional to dose, without a threshold. Based on this idea that any dose, no matter how small, will increase risk, radiation protection regulations generally attempt to reduce any exposure to "as low as reasonably achievable" (ALARA). We know however, that these regulatory assumptions are inconsistent with the known biological effects of low doses. Low doses induce protective effects, and these adaptive responses are part of a general response to low stress. Adaptive responses have been tightly conserved during evolution, from single celled organisms up to humans, indicating their importance. Here we examine cellular and animal studies that show the influence of radiation induced protective effects on diverse diseases, and examine the radiation dose range that is effective for different tissues in the same animal. The concept of a dose window, with upper and lower effective doses, as well as the effect of multiple stressors and the influence of genetics will also be examined. The effect of the biological variables on low dose responses will be considered from the point of view of the limitations they may impose on any revised radiation protection regulations.

Keywords: Adaptive response; Ionizing radiation; Protective thresholds; Radiation protection.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection). 2007. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103; Ann. ICRP 37 (2–4) - PubMed
    1. Averbeck D. 2009. Does scientific evidence support a change from the LNT model for low-dose radiation risk extrapolation? Health Phys 95:493–504 - PubMed
    1. Broome EJ, Brown DL, Mitchel REJ. 2002. Dose responses for adaption to low doses of 60Co-γ and 3H-β radiation in normal human fibroblasts. Radiat Res 158:181–186 - PubMed
    1. Dolling J-A, Boreham DR, Brown DL, Mitchel REJ, Raaphorst GP. 1998. Modulation of Radiation-Induced Strand Break Repair by Cisplatin in Mammalian Cells. Int J Radiat Biol 74:61–69 - PubMed
    1. Mitchel REJ. 2006. Low doses of radiation are protective in vitro and in vivo: Evolutionary origins. Dose Response 4:75–90 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources