Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2015 Oct 11;4(11):711-4.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.184.

Ethical Perspective: Five Unacceptable Trade-offs on the Path to Universal Health Coverage

Affiliations
Editorial

Ethical Perspective: Five Unacceptable Trade-offs on the Path to Universal Health Coverage

Ole Frithjof Norheim. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

This article discusses what ethicists have called "unacceptable trade-offs" in health policy choices related to universal health coverage (UHC). Since the fiscal space is constrained, trade-offs need to be made. But some trade-offs are unacceptable on the path to universal coverage. Unacceptable choices include, among other examples from low-income countries, to expand coverage for services with lower priority such as coronary bypass surgery before securing universal coverage for high-priority services such as skilled birth attendance and services for easily preventable or treatable fatal childhood diseases. Services of the latter kind include oral rehydration therapy for children with diarrhea and antibiotics for children with pneumonia. The article explains why such trade-offs are unfair and unacceptable even if political considerations may push in the opposite direction.

Keywords: Equity; Ethics; Health Policy; Rationing; Universal Healthcare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Making Fair Choices on the Path to Universal Health Coverage. Final Report of the WHO Consultative Group on Equity and Universal Health Coverage. Geneva: WHO; 2014. - PubMed
    1. Voorhoeve A, Ottersen T, Norheim OF. Response to our critics. Health Econ Policy Law. 2015 doi: 10.1017/S1744133114000590. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Voorhoeve A, Ottersen T, Norheim OF. Making fair choices on the path to universal health coverage: a précis. Health Econ Policy Law. 2015 doi: 10.1017/S1744133114000541. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1999.
    1. Daniels N. Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources