Vinflunine-gemcitabine versus vinflunine-carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in cisplatin-unfit patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: results of an international randomized phase II trial (JASINT1)
- PMID: 26673352
- PMCID: PMC4769994
- DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv609
Vinflunine-gemcitabine versus vinflunine-carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in cisplatin-unfit patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: results of an international randomized phase II trial (JASINT1)
Abstract
Background: There is no standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) in cisplatin-ineligible (cisplatin-unfit) patients. The study assessed the efficacy and tolerability profile of two vinflunine-based cytotoxic regimens in this setting.
Patients and methods: Patients with aUC a creatinine clearance (CrCl) of <60 but ≥30 ml/min, performance status 0 or 1 and no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease were randomized (1 : 1). They received vinflunine 250 or 280 mg/m(2) (based on baseline CrCl) on day 1, plus either gemcitabine [750 mg/m(2) escalated to 1000 mg/m(2) in cycle 2 if no toxicity grade (G) ≥2 on days 1 and 8 (VG) or plus carboplatin area under the curve 4.5 day 1 (VC) every 21 days]. To detect a 22% improvement in each arm compared with H0 (41%) in the primary end point, disease control rate (DCR = complete response + partial response + stable disease), 31 assessable patients per arm were required (α = 5%, β = 20%).
Results: Sixty-nine patients were enrolled (34 VG, 35 VC). Less G3/4 haematological adverse events (AEs) were reported with VG: neutropaenia was seen in 38% (versus 68% with VC) and febrile neutropaenia in 3% (versus 14% with VC) of patients. No major differences were observed for non-haematological AEs. DCR was 77% in both groups; overall response rate (ORR) was 44.1% versus 28.6%, with a median progression-free survival of 5.9 versus 6.1 months and median OS of 14.0 versus 12.8 months with VG and VC, respectively.
Conclusion: Both vinflunine-based doublets offer a similar DCR, ORR and OS. The better haematological tolerance favours the VG combination, which warrants further study. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV PROTOCOL IDENTIFIER: NCT 01599013.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01599013.
Keywords: bladder cancer; cisplatin-ineligible; renal impairment; urothelial carcinoma; vinflunine.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
Comment in
-
Re: Vinflunine-gemcitabine Versus Vinflunine-carboplatin as First-line Chemotherapy in Cisplatin-unfit Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Results of an International Randomized Phase II Trial (JASINT1).Eur Urol. 2016 Aug;70(2):399-400. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.066. Epub 2016 Apr 18. Eur Urol. 2016. PMID: 27353965 No abstract available.
References
-
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organisation. GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. http://globocan.iarc.fr (18 August 2014, date last accessed).
-
- Bellmunt J, Orsola A, Leow JJ et al. . Bladder cancer: ESMO Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2014; 25(suppl 3): iii40–iii48. - PubMed
-
- Witjes JA, Compérat E, Cowan NC et al. . EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2013 guidelines. Eur Urol 2014; 65(4): 778–792. - PubMed
-
- Galsky MD, Hahn NM, Rosenberg J et al. . A consensus definition of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12(3): 211–214. - PubMed
-
- De Santis M, Bellmunt J, Mead G et al. . Randomized phase II/III trial assessing gemcitabine/carboplatin and methotrexate/carboplatin/vinblastine in patients with advanced urothelial cancer who are unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy: EORTC study 30986. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 191–199. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical