Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 7;25(3):363-72.
doi: 10.18865/ed.25.3.363.

Case Study of an Unsustainable Community-Academic Partnership: Toward Core Standards for the Structure of Emerging Participatory Research

Affiliations

Case Study of an Unsustainable Community-Academic Partnership: Toward Core Standards for the Structure of Emerging Participatory Research

José L Calderón et al. Ethn Dis. .

Abstract

This report retrospectively examines the structure of an emerging community-academic participatory research (PR) partnership that was not sustainable, despite attempts to adhere to PR principles and demonstrable success in research outcomes. The influence of community and academic parent organizations on the PR process and outcomes is presented in the context of the Donabedian Model. We dissected the structural elements contributed by parent organizations to forming the structure of the PR partnership (memorandum of understanding, policy environment, human resources and effort, community and academic resources, expertise and experience, and funding) and explored the influence of potential and actual conflicts on the PR partnership's sustainability. The effect of potential and actual conflict on the PR process and quality of PR outcomes is discussed. Based on this, we conclude by proposing seven core standards for the establishment and development of emerging community-academic PR partnerships.

Keywords: Conflict Resolution; Core Standards; Disambiguation; Organizational Structure; Participatory Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: None declared.

References

    1. HHS Action Plan to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Disparities. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC; 2011. minorityhealth.hhs.gov/npa/files/Plans/HHS/HHS_Plan_complete.pdf. Accessed February 4, 2015.
    1. National Partnership for Action to End Health Disparities National Stakeholder Strategy for Achieving Health Equity. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Minority Health. minorityhealth.hhs.gov/npa/templates/content.aspx?lvl=1&lvlid=33&ID=286. Accessed February 4, 2015.
    1. Hoddinott J, Adato M, Besley T, Haddad L (1999) Participation and Poverty Reduction: Issues, theory, and new evidence from South Africa. Discussion paper No. 98. International Food Policy Research Institute and World Bank. Washington, DC; 2001. ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/fcndp98.pdf. Accessed February 4, 2015
    1. Narayan D, Patel R, Shafft K, Rademacher A, Koch-Schulte S. Voices of the Poor: Can anyone hear us? Washington, DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press; 2000, elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/0-1952-1601-6. Accessed February 4, 2015, 10.1596/0-1952-1601-6. - DOI - DOI
    1. Woolcock M, Narayan D. Social capital: implications for development theory, research, and policy. World Bank Res Obs. 2000;15(2):225-249. 10.1093/wbro/15.2.225 - DOI

Publication types