Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 May;7(3):181-91.
doi: 10.1177/1758834015572284.

Long-term survival as a treatment benchmark in melanoma: latest results and clinical implications

Affiliations
Review

Long-term survival as a treatment benchmark in melanoma: latest results and clinical implications

Kenneth F Grossmann et al. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2015 May.

Abstract

Historically, stage III-IV melanoma patients have had few options to achieve long-term survival. For patients with stage III disease, surgery alone may be curative for approximately 50%. Adjuvant treatment with a slightly greater impact on relapse-free survival at the cost of substantial toxicity, and studies are ongoing to test the adjuvant benefit of other immunotherapies that appear more active and less toxic in advanced melanoma. Achieving long term survival for stage IV patients had been rare until recently and progress was painfully slow with traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy; review of multiple phase II studies showed universally poor results. Fortunately, since the approval by the US Food and Drug Administration of agents targeting the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) receptor, as well as those targeting B-raf and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway for patients whose melanoma is 'driven' by a BRAF mutation, long-term survival of stage IV melanoma is increasing substantially. Here we review the examples of studies documenting potentially curative approaches to melanoma and propose suggestions for the use of various treatments in achieving this important goal.

Keywords: b-raf; dabrafenib; immunotherapy; ipilimumab; melanoma; nivolumab; pembrolizumab; targeted therapy; trametinib; vemurafenib.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: K.G. has performed advisory work for Genentech in the last three years.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ackerman A., Klein O., McDermott D., Wang W., Ibrahim N., Lawrence D., et al. (2014) Outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy prior to or after BRAF inhibitors. Cancer 120: 1695–1701. - PubMed
    1. Ascierto P., Minor D., Ribas A., Lebbe C., O’Hagan A., Arya N., et al. (2013) Phase II trial (BREAK-2) of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (GSK2118436) in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 31: 3205–3211. - PubMed
    1. Ascierto P., Simeone E., Sileni V., Del Vecchio M., Marchetti P., Cappellini G., et al. (2014a) Sequential treatment with ipilimumab and BRAF inhibitors in patients with metastatic melanoma: data from the Italian cohort of the ipilimumab expanded access program. Cancer Invest 32: 144–149. - PubMed
    1. Ascierto P., Simeone E., Sileni V., Pigozzo J., Maio M., Altomonte M., et al. (2014b) Clinical experience with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg: real-world efficacy and safety data from an expanded access programme cohort. J Transl Med 12: 116. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atkins M., Hsu J., Lee S., Cohen G., Flaherty L., Sosman J., et al. (2008) Phase III trial comparing concurrent biochemotherapy with cisplatin, vinblastine, dacarbazine, interleukin-2, and interferon alfa-2b with cisplatin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine alone in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma (E3695): a trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 26: 5748–5754. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources