[The application of peripartum use of pulmonary artery catheter in pregnant patients with pulmonary hypertension]
- PMID: 26674795
[The application of peripartum use of pulmonary artery catheter in pregnant patients with pulmonary hypertension]
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the application and value of pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) in pregnant patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH).
Methods: The clinical data of pregnant patients with PH who were treated between 2006 and 2014 in surgical intensive care unit (SICU) at Capital Medical University affiliated Beijing Anzhen Hospital were retrospectively analysed. The differences of the clinical characteristics and outcome between PAC inserted patients and PAC not inserted patients were compared.
Results: The systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) measured by preoperative echocardiography has no significant difference between the PAC inserted patients [(103.0 ± 24.1) mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa)] and PAC not inserted patients [(96.4 ± 27.3) mmHg; P = 0.175]. SPAP may be overestimated or underestimated by echocardiography compared with PAC with a gap from -38.4 mmHg to 49.5 mmHg. The rates of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (20.0% vs 3.2%) and continuous use of epidural anesthesia (89.1% vs 65.1%) were higher in PAC inserted patients compared with PAC not inserted patients. Norepinephrine, dobutamine, sildenafil, alprostadil, iloprost and low molecular weight heparin were more widely used in PAC inserted patients. The mortality rate and the rates of low birth weight (63.9% vs 30.6%) and very low birth weight infants (19.4% vs 13.9%) were all higher in PAC inserted patients, while the rate of induced abortion was lower in this group (5.5% vs 17.5%). The length of stay in surgical intensive care unit [6.0 (5.0) d vs 1.0 (3.0) d], postoperative length of stay [8.0 (6.0) d vs 8.0 (4.0) d] and total hospital costs [43 999.22 (38 267.27) RMB vs 14 878.24 (10 564.47) RMB] were all higher in PAC inserted patients. The incidence rate of PAC related complications was 7.3%.
Conclusions: In moderate or severe PH pregnant patients with severe clinical symptoms, perioperative insertion of PAC helps to monitor the perinatal pulmonary arterial pressure(PAP) and guide treatment, potentially improving clinical outcomes and lowering the short term mortality. PAC can't be replaced by echocardiography in measuring PAP.
Similar articles
-
[Analysis of high risk factors for patient death and its clinical characteristics on pregnancy associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jul;49(7):495-500. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014. PMID: 25327730 Chinese.
-
[Preoperative risk factors analysis of pulmonary hypertension crisis during perioperative period for caesarean section of woman with severe pulmonary hypertension].Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 May;29(5):431-435. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.05.009. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017. PMID: 28524032 Chinese.
-
[Clinical study on sildenafil in treatment of pregnant women with pulmonary arterial hypertension].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jun;49(6):414-8. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014. PMID: 25169631 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
Pregnancy outcome in a pregnant patient with idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: a case report and review of the literature.J Med Case Rep. 2018 Feb 13;12(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13256-017-1547-1. J Med Case Rep. 2018. PMID: 29433561 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does the pulmonary artery catheter still have a role in the perioperative period?Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 May;39(3):345-55. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900305. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011. PMID: 21675054 Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous