Is age a limiting factor for adaptation to cochlear implant?
- PMID: 26676874
- DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3849-5
Is age a limiting factor for adaptation to cochlear implant?
Abstract
The influence of age on adaptation to cochlear implant (CI) is still being contested in the literature. The aim of this study was twofold. First, hearing outcomes in quiet conditions were compared between CI users implanted over and under the age of 70 years. Second, the effect of the duration of auditory deprivation was investigated. The study design is a retrospective review and the setting is in academic tertiary referral center. One hundred and twenty-one postlingually deafened implanted adults participated in this study. Hearing outcomes were compared between 121 postlingually deafened adults implanted under 40, between 40 and 70, and over 70 years of age. Speech audiometry measurements were taken at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 60 months post-cochlear implantation (pCI), in quiet conditions only. Hearing outcomes were significantly better only at 1 year pCI in the youngest group compared to the two older groups. No significant difference was observed between the middle-aged and eldest subjects at any time. The influence of the severe-to-profound hearing loss (SPHL) duration was investigated and found to be equally distributed among the different age groups. Good hearing outcomes in elderly patients are not secondary to a difference in SPHL duration. Age should not be a limiting factor for cochlear implantation decision.
Keywords: Age effect; Auditory deprivation; Cochlear implant; Elderly; Performance.
Similar articles
-
Evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for postlingually deafened adults.Int J Audiol. 2016;55 Suppl 2:S3-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2016.1146415. Epub 2016 Mar 10. Int J Audiol. 2016. PMID: 26963131
-
Spectral-Temporal Modulated Ripple Discrimination by Children With Cochlear Implants.Ear Hear. 2018 Jan/Feb;39(1):60-68. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000463. Ear Hear. 2018. PMID: 28682810 Free PMC article.
-
Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?Laryngoscope. 2016 Mar;126(3):699-706. doi: 10.1002/lary.25525. Epub 2015 Aug 8. Laryngoscope. 2016. PMID: 26256441
-
Long-term performance of cochlear implants in postlingually deafened adults.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Jul;147(1):112-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599812438041. Epub 2012 Feb 17. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012. PMID: 22344289
-
Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.Otol Neurotol. 2007 Aug;28(5):649-57. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000281807.89938.60. Otol Neurotol. 2007. PMID: 17712290
Cited by
-
Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults is Time-sensitive Towards Positive Outcome: Prediction using Advanced Machine Learning Techniques.Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 20;8(1):18004. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36404-1. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30573747 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear implantation in the elderly: outcomes, long-term evolution, and predictive factors.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;275(4):913-922. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4910-y. Epub 2018 Feb 26. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018. PMID: 29480360
-
Hearing Outcomes and Complications of Cochlear Implantation in Elderly Patients over 75 Years of Age.J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 15;10(14):3123. doi: 10.3390/jcm10143123. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34300290 Free PMC article.
-
Duration of deafness impacts auditory performance after cochlear implantation: A meta-analysis.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Feb 4;6(2):291-301. doi: 10.1002/lio2.528. eCollection 2021 Apr. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021. PMID: 33869761 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous