Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Jun;27(6):849-57.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2893-4. Epub 2015 Dec 16.

Risk factors for recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury (rOASI): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Swati Jha  1 , Victoria Parker  2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Risk factors for recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury (rOASI): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Swati Jha et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to estimate the risk of recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury (rOASI) in women who have suffered anal sphincter injury in their previous pregnancy and analyse risk factors for recurrence through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: A review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches were made in Ovid MEDLINE (1996 to May 2015), PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar, including bibliographies and conference proceedings.

Methods of study selection: Observational studies (cohort/case-control) evaluating rOASI and risk factors were selected by two reviewers who also analysed methodological quality of those studies. Pooled odds ratios (OR) for rOASI and individual risk factors were calculated using RevMan 5.3.

Tabulation, integration and results: From the eight studies assessed, overall risk of rOASI was 6.3 % compared with a 5.7 % risk of OASI in the first pregnancy. The risk in parous women with no previous OASI was 1.5 %. Factors that increased the risk in a future pregnancy were instrumental delivery with forceps [OR 3.12, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.42-4.01) or ventouse (OR 2.44, 95 % CI 1.83-3.25), previous fourth-degree tear (OR 1.7, 95 % CI 1.24-2.36) and birth weight ≥4 kg (OR 2.29, 95 % CI 2.06-2.54). Maternal age ≥35 years marginally increased the risk (OR 1.16, 95 % CI 1-1.35).

Conclusion: The overall rate of rOASI and associated risk factors for recurrence are similar to the rate and risk factors of primary OASI. Antenatal decisions could be based on assessment of foetal weight and intrapartum decisions based upon the requirement for an instrumental delivery.

Keywords: Anal sphincter injury; OASI; Recurrence; Subsequent delivery; Third/fourth-degree tear.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study search results
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Methodological quality of studies in this systematic review
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Laine K, Gissler M, Pirhonen J. Changing incidence of anal sphincter tears in four Nordic countries through the last decades. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146(1):71–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.04.033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peleg D, Kennedy CM, Merrill D, Zlatnik FJ. Risk of repetition of a severe perineal laceration. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(6):1021–1024. - PubMed
    1. Thiagamoorthy G, Johnson A, Thakar R, Sultan AH. National survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management in the United Kingdom. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(12):1621–1627. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2406-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. RCOG. Third- and Fourth-degree Perineal Tears, Management. Green Top Guideline No 29 1-3-2007
    1. Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120(12):1516–1525. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12363. - DOI - PubMed