Comparative Value of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Testing in Combination Versus Individually for the Diagnosis of Undifferentiated Patients With Suspected Inflammatory Disease or Serious Infection: A Systematic Review and Economic Analysis [Internet]
- PMID: 26677507
- Bookshelf ID: NBK333365
Comparative Value of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Testing in Combination Versus Individually for the Diagnosis of Undifferentiated Patients With Suspected Inflammatory Disease or Serious Infection: A Systematic Review and Economic Analysis [Internet]
Excerpt
Patients who have suspected inflammatory disease or serious infection may undergo a diagnostic workup that involves multiple laboratory tests. Two such laboratory tests are erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), non-specific blood tests often ordered together that are well established and widely used to aid the diagnosis of numerous conditions. The simultaneous and widespread use of both tests has raised concerns about their potential overuse, particularly if they provide little valuable information regarding patient management and outcomes.
The aim of this report is to address the issue of when, if ever, it is appropriate to concurrently test ESR and CRP (as opposed to testing only ESR or CRP) to help diagnose inflammatory disease or serious infection. Accordingly, research questions (see section 2) were developed to explore the added value associated with performing both tests rather than one.
Copyright © CADTH 2015.
Sections
- Reviewers
- Authorship
- Acknowledgements
- Conflicts of Interest
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Research Questions
- 3. Methods
- 4. Summary of Clinical Evidence
- 5. Summary of Economic Evidence
- 6. Primary Economic Evaluation
- 7. Discussion
- References
- Appendix 1 Literature Search Strategy
- Appendix 2 Title and Abstract Screening Checklist
- Appendix 3 Full Text Screening Checklist
- Appendix 4 QUADAS-2 Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
- Appendix 5 Clinical Data Abstraction Form
- Appendix 6 Details of Outcome Measures for Assessment of Diagnostic Test Performance
- Appendix 7 Selection of Included Studies
- Appendix 8 List of Included and Excluded Studies
- Appendix 9 Characteristics of Included Studies
- Appendix 10 Risk of Bias and Applicability in the Included Diagnosis Studies (Results of QUADAS-2 Quality Assessment)
- Appendix 11 Test Characteristics and Estimated Test Results Using Data From Included Studies
- Appendix 12 Diagnostic Performance of ESR and CRP Individually and in Combination Compared With the Reference Standard
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous