Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec 17;10(12):e0143263.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143263. eCollection 2015.

Joy Leads to Overconfidence, and a Simple Countermeasure

Affiliations

Joy Leads to Overconfidence, and a Simple Countermeasure

Philipp Koellinger et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Overconfidence has been identified as a source of suboptimal decision making in many real-life domains, with often far-reaching consequences. This study identifies a mechanism that can cause overconfidence and demonstrates a simple, effective countermeasure in an incentive-compatible experimental study. We observed that joy induced overconfidence if the reason for joy (an unexpected gift) was unrelated to the judgment task and if participants were not made specifically aware of this mood manipulation. In contrast, we observed well-calibrated judgments among participants in a control group who were in their resting mood. Furthermore, we found well-calibrated judgments among participants who received the joyful mood induction together with questions that forced them to reflect on their current mood and the (ir)relevance of its cause to our judgment tasks. Our findings suggest that being aware of one's positive mood and the reason for that mood may effectively reduce overconfidence for a short period.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The relative frequency of under- and overconfident judgments for absolute (ap) and relative (rp) performance and their standard errors (N = 213).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Absolute overconfidence across experimental groups, means, and standard errors (N = 213).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Relative overconfidence across experimental groups, means, and standard errors (N = 213).

References

    1. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. London, UK: Penguin Books; 2011.
    1. Cooper AC, Woo CY, Dunkelberg WC. Entrepreneurs' perceived chances for success. J Bus Venturing. 1988; 3(2): 97–108.
    1. Camerer C, Lovallo D. Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. Am Econ Rev. 1999; 89: 306–318.
    1. Koellinger P, Minniti M, Schade C. “I think I can, I think I can”–Overconfidence and entrepreneurial behavior. J Econ Psych. 2007. 28: 502–527.
    1. Simonsohn U. eBays crowded evenings: Competition neglect in market entry decisions. Manage Sci. 2010; 56: 1060–1073.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources