Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2016:2016:2720650.
doi: 10.1155/2016/2720650. Epub 2015 Nov 22.

Participant Experiences in the Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young Study: Common Reasons for Withdrawing

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

Participant Experiences in the Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young Study: Common Reasons for Withdrawing

Barbro Lernmark et al. J Diabetes Res. 2016.

Abstract

Background: To characterize participant reasons for withdrawing from a diabetes focused longitudinal clinical observational trial (TEDDY) during the first three study years.

Methods: 8677 children were recruited into the TEDDY study. At participant withdrawal staff recorded any reason parents provided for withdrawal. Reasons were categorized into (1) family characteristics and (2) protocol reasons. Families who informed staff of their withdrawal were classified as active withdrawals (AW); families without a final contact were considered passive withdrawals (PW).

Results: Withdrawal was highest during the first study year (n = 1220). Most families were AW (n = 1549; 73.4%). PW was more common in the United States (n = 1001; 37.8%) and among young mothers (p = 0.001). The most frequent protocol characteristic was blood draw (55%) and the most common family reason was not having enough time (66%). The blood draw was more common among female participants; being too busy was more common among males. Both reasons were associated with study satisfaction.

Conclusions: Results suggest that, for families of children genetically at risk for diabetes, procedures that can be painful/frightening should be used with caution. Study procedures must also be considered for the demands placed on participants. Study satisfaction should be regularly assessed as an indicator of risk for withdrawal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study population.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of withdrawals by age of last visit and by country divided into passive withdrawals (PW) (checked) and active withdrawals (AW) (white).

References

    1. The TEDDY Study Group. The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study: study design. Pediatric Diabetes. 2007;8(5):286–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2007.00269.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karlson C. W., Rapoff M. A. Attrition in randomized controlled trials for pediatric chronic conditions. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2009;34(7):782–793. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn122. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Butz A. M., Halterman J. S., Bellin M., et al. Factors associated with completion of a behavioral intervention for caregivers of urban children with asthma. Journal of Asthma. 2012;49(9):977–988. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.721435. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Driscoll K. A., Killian M., Johnson S. B., Silverstein J. H., Deeb L. C. Predictors of study completion and withdrawal in a randomized clinical trial of a pediatric diabetes adherence intervention. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2009;30(3):212–220. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.01.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams N. A., Coday M., Somes G., Tylavsky F. A., Richey P. A., Hare M. Risk factors for poor attendance in a family-based pediatric obesity intervention program for young children. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. 2010;31(9):705–712. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3181f17b1c. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources