Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug;63(5):337-45.
doi: 10.1111/zph.12245. Epub 2015 Dec 18.

Will Culling White-Tailed Deer Prevent Lyme Disease?

Affiliations
Review

Will Culling White-Tailed Deer Prevent Lyme Disease?

K J Kugeler et al. Zoonoses Public Health. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

White-tailed deer play an important role in the ecology of Lyme disease. In the United States, where the incidence and geographic range of Lyme disease continue to increase, reduction of white-tailed deer populations has been proposed as a means of preventing human illness. The effectiveness of this politically sensitive prevention method is poorly understood. We summarize and evaluate available evidence regarding the effect of deer reduction on vector tick abundance and human disease incidence. Elimination of deer from islands and other isolated settings can have a substantial impact on the reproduction of blacklegged ticks, while reduction short of complete elimination has yielded mixed results. To date, most studies have been conducted in ecologic situations that are not representative to the vast majority of areas with high human Lyme disease risk. Robust evidence linking deer control to reduced human Lyme disease risk is lacking. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend deer population reduction as a Lyme disease prevention measure, except in specific ecologic circumstances.

Keywords: Lyme disease; deer; deer reduction; prevention; public health intervention; tick.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interests declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Deer density and corresponding nymphal Ixodes scapularis abundance in studies where tick abundance measured as mean number collected per mouse or rat. Year 0 = measurement at the start of deer intervention; data extrapolated from manuscripts when not provided explicitly, and may not be exact.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Deer density and corresponding nymphal Ixodes scapularis abundance in studies where tick abundance measured as number questing per 100 m2. Year 0 is the measurement at the start of the deer intervention; data extrapolated from manuscripts when not provided explicitly and may not be exact.

References

    1. Anderson JF, Magnarelli LA. Vertebrate host relationships and distribution of ixodid ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in Connecticut, USA. J Med. Entomol. 1980;17:314–323. - PubMed
    1. Connally NP, Ginsberg HS, Mather TN. Assessing peridomestic entomological factors as predictors for Lyme disease. J Vector. Ecol. 2006;31:364–370. - PubMed
    1. Conover M. Resolving Human-Wildlife Conflicts: the Science of Wildlife Damage Management. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers; 2002.
    1. Daniels TJ, Fish D. Effect of deer exclusion on the abundance of immature Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) parasitizing small and medium-sized mammals. J Med. Entomol. 1995;32:5–11. - PubMed
    1. Daniels TJ, Fish D, Schwartz I. Reduced abundance of Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) and Lyme disease risk by deer exclusion. J Med. Entomol. 1993;30:1043–1049. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms