Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Dec;25(12):888-93.
doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

The association between states' texting regulations and the prevalence of texting while driving among U.S. high school students

Toni M Rudisill  1 , Motao Zhu  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

The association between states' texting regulations and the prevalence of texting while driving among U.S. high school students

Toni M Rudisill et al. Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine which distracted driving laws were associated with decreased texting while driving among U.S. teenage drivers.

Methods: Data from the 2013 Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System survey were merged with states' distracted driving legislation. The prevalence of texting while driving was assessed for different laws using log-binomial regression.

Results: Approximately 39.0% of students reported texting while driving at least once in the 30 days before survey. Compared to states with universal texting bans along with young driver all cellphone bans, the adjusted ratio of texting while driving was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.16) in states with no bans, 1.33 (95% CI, 1.11-1.58) for young driver bans only, 1.24 (95% CI, 1.00-1.52) in states with bans for young drivers but no young driver all cellphone bans, and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.66-1.19) in states with universal texting bans. The prevalence of texting was 28% less in states with delays of full licensure for texting offenses (prevalence ratio = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88).

Conclusions: Universal texting bans along with young driver all cellphone bans may be more effective in reducing texting while driving. Delays of full licensure may dissuade young drivers from texting and driving.

Keywords: Adolescent; Automobile driving; Epidemiology; Text messaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Both authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Eby DW, Vivoda JM, St Louis RM. Driver hand-held cellular phone use: a four-year analysis. J Safety Res. 2006;37(3):261–265. - PubMed
    1. Lee JD. Technology and teen drivers. J Safety Res. 2007;38(2):203–213. - PubMed
    1. Westlake EJ, Boyle LN. Perceptions of driver distraction among teenage drivers. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2012;15:644–653.
    1. Lam LT. Distractions and the risk of car crash injury: the effect of drivers’ age. J Safety Res. 2002;33(3):411–419. - PubMed
    1. Wilson FA, Stimpson JP. Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(11):2213–2219. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources