Aortic Counterpulsation Therapy in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure: Analysis of the TBRIDGE Registry
- PMID: 26690691
- PMCID: PMC4728592
- DOI: 10.5935/abc.20150147
Aortic Counterpulsation Therapy in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure: Analysis of the TBRIDGE Registry
Abstract
Background: The use of aortic counterpulsation therapy in advanced heart failure is controversial.
Objectives: To evaluate the hemodynamic and metabolic effects of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and its impact on 30-day mortality in patients with heart failure.
Methods: Historical prospective, unicentric study to evaluate all patients treated with IABP between August/2008 and July/2013, included in an institutional registry named TBRIDGE (The Brazilian Registry of Intra-aortic balloon pump in Decompensated heart failure - Global Evaluation). We analyzed changes in oxygen central venous saturation (ScvO2), arterial lactate, and use of vasoactive drugs at 48 hours after IABP insertion. The 30-day mortality was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and differences in subgroups were evaluated by the Log-rank test.
Results: A total of 223 patients (mean age 49 ± 14 years) were included. Mean left ventricle ejection fraction was 24 ± 10%, and 30% of patients had Chagas disease. Compared with pre-IABP insertion, we observed an increase in ScvO2 (50.5% vs. 65.5%, p < 0.001) and use of nitroprusside (33.6% vs. 47.5%, p < 0.001), and a decrease in lactate levels (31.4 vs. 16.7 mg/dL, p < 0.001) and use of vasopressors (36.3% vs. 25.6%, p = 0.003) after IABP insertion. Thirty-day survival was 69%, with lower mortality in Chagas disease patients compared without the disease (p = 0.008).
Conclusion: After 48 hours of use, IABP promoted changes in the use of vasoactive drugs, improved tissue perfusion. Chagas etiology was associated with lower 30-day mortality. Aortic counterpulsation therapy is an effective method of circulatory support for patients waiting for heart transplantation.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Intra-aortic counterpulsation for hemodynamic support in patients with acute ischemic versus non-ischemic heart failure.J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Nov;24(11):583-8. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 23117313
-
Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Response and Predictors of Stabilization.J Card Fail. 2015 Nov;21(11):868-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.06.383. Epub 2015 Jul 9. J Card Fail. 2015. PMID: 26164215 Free PMC article.
-
Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation Pumps in Advanced Heart Failure.J Card Fail. 2017 Aug;23(8):606-614. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 26. J Card Fail. 2017. PMID: 28554716
-
Counterpulsation: historical background, technical improvements, hemodynamic and metabolic effects.Cardiology. 1994;84(3):156-67. doi: 10.1159/000176394. Cardiology. 1994. PMID: 8205565 Review.
-
Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.Eur Heart J. 2009 Sep;30(17):2102-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp292. Epub 2009 Jul 18. Eur Heart J. 2009. PMID: 19617601 Review.
Cited by
-
Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5):e004337. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004337. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 28500136 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intra-aortic balloon pump on in-hospital outcomes of cardiogenic shock: findings from a nationwide registry, China.ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Aug;8(4):3286-3294. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13479. Epub 2021 Jun 21. ESC Heart Fail. 2021. PMID: 34155835 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting survival in patients with acute decompensated heart failure complicated by cardiogenic shock.Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 Jun 4;34:100809. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100809. eCollection 2021 Jun. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021. PMID: 34141863 Free PMC article.
-
Main Considerations of Cardiogenic Shock and Its Predictors: Systematic Review.Cardiol Res. 2018 Apr;9(2):75-82. doi: 10.14740/cr715w. Epub 2018 Apr 25. Cardiol Res. 2018. PMID: 29755623 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Retrospective Analysis of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Cardiology Ward Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography between 2012 and 2020.J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 16;12(4):1567. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041567. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36836102 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sanborn TA, Sleeper LA, Bates EE, Jacobs AK, Boland J, French JK, et al. Impact of thrombolysis, intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation, and their combination in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Should we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(3) Suppl A:1123–1129. - PubMed
-
- Ferguson JJ, 3rd, Cohen M, Freedman RJ, Jr, Stone GW, Miller MF, Joseph DL, et al. The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: results from Benchmark Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(5):1456–1462. - PubMed
-
- Stone GW, Ohman EM, Miller MF, Joseph DL, Christenson JT, Cohen M, et al. Contemporary utilization and outcomes of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction: the benchmark registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(11):1940–1945. - PubMed
-
- Cohen M, Urban P, Christenson JT, Joseph DL, Freedman RJ, Jr, Miller MF, et al. Benchmark Registry Collaborators Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in US and non-US centres: results of the Benchmark Registry. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(19):1763–1770. - PubMed
-
- Santa-Cruz RA, Cohen MG, Ohman EM. Aortic counterpulsation: a review of the hemodynamic effects and indications for use. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;67(1):68–77. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical