Static endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: Transoral endoscopy during clinical swallow evaluations
- PMID: 26691853
- PMCID: PMC4916032
- DOI: 10.1002/lary.25828
Static endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: Transoral endoscopy during clinical swallow evaluations
Abstract
Objectives/hypothesis: To determine the sensitivity and specificity for assessing pharyngeal residue, laryngeal penetration, and tracheal aspiration when comparing findings from the Static Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (SEES) with findings from the Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study (VFSS).
Methods: Retrospective study at a tertiary academic medical center. Records were reviewed consecutive outpatients who underwent both SEES and VFSS evaluations. Video segments from SEES and VFSS examinations were blindly judged by experienced clinicians on a categorical/ordinal rating form for the absence, quantitative presence, and location of postswallow residue, penetration, and aspiration. Statistical analysis was performed to identify intra- and interrater reliability and correlation between SEES and VFSS findings.
Results: Thirty-nine patients were identified who met the above inclusion criteria, for a total of 206 video segments. Inter- and intrarater reliability was judged by Cronbach's alpha to be good to excellent. SEES findings revealed statistically significant correlations with VFSS findings (P < 0.001) with the absence, quantitative presence, and location of thin liquid and solid swallow residue, penetration, and aspiration. In addition, SEES was more sensitive to the presence of liquid residue, penetration, and aspiration than VFSS.
Conclusion: SEES is an endoscopic screening procedure that strengthens the clinical swallowing evaluation by documenting the presence or absence of postswallow residue, penetration, and aspiration. Accurate identification of a patient's risk for aspiration helps to direct further workup. It is an expedient, repeatable, and clinical relevant procedure that can be easily incorporated into a clinician's practice.
Level of evidence: 4. Laryngoscope, 126:2291-2294, 2016.
Keywords: Rigid; clinical swallow evaluation; dysphagia; endoscopy; swallowing; transoral; videofluoroscopy.
© 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors in this study certify that they have no non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Similar articles
-
Psychometric Properties of Visuoperceptual Measures of Videofluoroscopic and Fibre-Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.Dysphagia. 2019 Feb;34(1):2-33. doi: 10.1007/s00455-018-9918-3. Epub 2018 Jul 17. Dysphagia. 2019. PMID: 30019178
-
Static endoscopic swallow evaluation in children.Laryngoscope. 2020 Jun;130(6):1590-1594. doi: 10.1002/lary.28263. Epub 2019 Aug 26. Laryngoscope. 2020. PMID: 31448817
-
Adding Endoscopist-Directed Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing to the Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study Increased the Detection Rates of Penetration, Aspiration, and Pharyngeal Residue.Gut Liver. 2015 Sep 23;9(5):623-8. doi: 10.5009/gnl14147. Gut Liver. 2015. PMID: 25473074 Free PMC article.
-
Correlations between Aspiration and Pharyngeal Residue Scale Scores for Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation and Videofluoroscopy.Yonsei Med J. 2019 Dec;60(12):1181-1186. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.12.1181. Yonsei Med J. 2019. PMID: 31769249 Free PMC article.
-
The modified barium swallow and the functional endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013 Dec;46(6):1009-22. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Oct 8. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013. PMID: 24262956 Review.
Cited by
-
Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety (VASES): A Standardized Approach to Rating Pharyngeal Residue, Penetration, and Aspiration During FEES.Dysphagia. 2022 Apr;37(2):417-435. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10293-5. Epub 2021 Apr 10. Dysphagia. 2022. PMID: 33837841
-
Psychometric Properties of Visuoperceptual Measures of Videofluoroscopic and Fibre-Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.Dysphagia. 2019 Feb;34(1):2-33. doi: 10.1007/s00455-018-9918-3. Epub 2018 Jul 17. Dysphagia. 2019. PMID: 30019178
-
Predictive values of static endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in adults.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Oct 23;6(6):1383-1388. doi: 10.1002/lio2.615. eCollection 2021 Dec. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021. PMID: 34938878 Free PMC article.
-
Validity and reliability of the Group for Learning Useful and Performant Swallowing (GLUPS) tool.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb;281(2):817-826. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08313-1. Epub 2023 Dec 6. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 38055045
-
The effect of "xanthan gum-based fluid thickener" on hydration, swallowing functions and nutritional status in total maxillectomy patients.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Dec;275(12):2997-3005. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5167-1. Epub 2018 Oct 22. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018. PMID: 30345475 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- McCullough GH, Rosenbeck JC, Wertz RT, McCoy S, Mann G, McCullough K. Utility of clinical swallowing examination measures for detecting aspiration post-stroke. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2005;48:1280–1293. - PubMed
-
- Daniels SK, McAdam CP, Brailey K, Foundas AL. Clinical assessment of swallowing and prediction of dysphagia severity. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 1997;6(4):17–24.
-
- DePippo KL, Holas MA, Reding MJ. Validation of the 3-oz water swallow test for aspiration following stroke. Archives of Neurology. 1992;49:1259–1261. - PubMed
-
- Leder SB, Espinosa JF. Aspiration risk after acute stroke: Comparison of clinical examination and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Dysphagia. 2002;17:214–218. - PubMed
-
- Linden P, Kuhlemeier KV, Patterson C. The probability of correctly predicting subglottic penetration from clinical observations. Dysphagia. 1993;8:170–179. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous