Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia and Patient Safety: Update of an Evidence-Based Analysis
- PMID: 26695877
- DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000295
Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia and Patient Safety: Update of an Evidence-Based Analysis
Abstract
In 2010, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine's evidence-based medicine assessment of ultrasound (US)-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) analyzed the effect of this nerve localization technology on patient safety. That analysis focused on 4 important regional anesthesia complications: peripheral nerve injury, local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), hemidiaphragmatic paresis (HDP), and pneumothorax. In the intervening 5 years, further research has allowed us to refine our original conclusions. This update reviews previous findings and critically evaluates new literature published since late 2009 that compares the patient safety attributes of UGRA with those of traditional nerve localization methods. As with the previous version of this exercise, analysis focused on randomized controlled trials that compared UGRA with an alternative neural localization method and case series of more than 500 patients. The Jadad score was used to grade individual study quality, and conclusions were graded as to strength of evidence. Of those randomized controlled trials identified by our search techniques, 28 compared the incidence of postoperative nerve symptoms, 27 assessed LAST parameters, 7 studied HDP, and 9 reported the incidence of pneumothorax. The current analysis strengthens our original conclusions that US guidance has no significant effect on the incidence of postoperative neurologic symptoms and that UGRA reduces the incidence and intensity of HDP but does so in an unpredictable manner. Conversely, emerging evidence supports the effectiveness of US guidance for reducing LAST across its clinical presentation continuum. The predicted frequency of pneumothorax has grown smaller in tandem with increased experience with US-guided supraclavicular block. This evidence-based review summarizes both the power and the limitations of UGRA as a tool for improving patient safety.
What's new: Since the original 2010 publication of this analysis, evidence has continued to support the concept that ultrasound (US) guidance does not meaningfully affect the incidence of peripheral nerve injury (PNI) associated with regional anesthesia. Similar confirmatory evidence attests to US guidance reducing the incidence and intensity of hemidiaphragmatic paresis (HDP) but not eliminating it. Literature published since late 2009 reports the effective role of US guidance in reducing the incidence of local anesthetic systemic toxicity and allows calculation of a lower predicted frequency of pneumothorax associated with US-guided supraclavicular blocks.
Similar articles
-
The Second American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Medicine Assessment of Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia: Executive Summary.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):181-94. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000331. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016. PMID: 26695878 Review.
-
Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and patient safety: An evidence-based analysis.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;35(2 Suppl):S59-67. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181ccbc96. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010. PMID: 20216027 Review.
-
Did ultrasound fulfill the promise of safety in regional anesthesia?Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):649-655. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000638. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018. PMID: 30004951 Review.
-
The ASRA evidence-based medicine assessment of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and pain medicine: Executive summary.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;35(2 Suppl):S1-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181d22fe0. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010. PMID: 20216019 Review.
-
Evidence-based medicine for ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.Anesthesiol Clin. 2014 Dec;32(4):771-87. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Sep 30. Anesthesiol Clin. 2014. PMID: 25453661 Review.
Cited by
-
Is accepted practice in regional anaesthesia really 'best practice'?BJA Educ. 2022 Mar;22(3):84-86. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2021.12.002. Epub 2022 Feb 2. BJA Educ. 2022. PMID: 35211324 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Comparison of the efficacy of costoclavicular space brachial plexus blockade with 0.5% versus 0.375% ropivacaine: a randomized, double-blind, single-centre, noninferiority clinical trial.Can J Anaesth. 2023 Jan;70(1):106-115. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02327-9. Epub 2022 Sep 15. Can J Anaesth. 2023. PMID: 36109453 Clinical Trial. English.
-
Integrating a Cadaver Review Session into the Existing Regional Anesthesia Training for Anesthesiology Residents: An Initial Experience.Med Sci Educ. 2020 Feb 24;30(2):695-703. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00934-z. eCollection 2020 Jun. Med Sci Educ. 2020. PMID: 34457727 Free PMC article.
-
Noninferiority of 0.25% versus 0.375% Ropivacaine in Popliteal Sciatic and Saphenous Nerve Blocks for Analgesia After Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Randomized Self-Paired Noninferiority Trial.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 May 19;19:4093-4104. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S508528. eCollection 2025. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025. PMID: 40416797 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The association between anesthesia type and postoperative outcomes in patients receiving primary total shoulder arthroplasty.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Oct;33(7):2813-2819. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03494-1. Epub 2023 Feb 18. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023. PMID: 36802033
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials