Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Dec 11:9:660.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00660. eCollection 2015.

Virtual Reality for Enhanced Ecological Validity and Experimental Control in the Clinical, Affective and Social Neurosciences

Affiliations
Review

Virtual Reality for Enhanced Ecological Validity and Experimental Control in the Clinical, Affective and Social Neurosciences

Thomas D Parsons. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

An essential tension can be found between researchers interested in ecological validity and those concerned with maintaining experimental control. Research in the human neurosciences often involves the use of simple and static stimuli lacking many of the potentially important aspects of real world activities and interactions. While this research is valuable, there is a growing interest in the human neurosciences to use cues about target states in the real world via multimodal scenarios that involve visual, semantic, and prosodic information. These scenarios should include dynamic stimuli presented concurrently or serially in a manner that allows researchers to assess the integrative processes carried out by perceivers over time. Furthermore, there is growing interest in contextually embedded stimuli that can constrain participant interpretations of cues about a target's internal states. Virtual reality environments proffer assessment paradigms that combine the experimental control of laboratory measures with emotionally engaging background narratives to enhance affective experience and social interactions. The present review highlights the potential of virtual reality environments for enhanced ecological validity in the clinical, affective, and social neurosciences.

Keywords: ecological validity; neuropsychological tests; neuropsychology; social neuroscience; virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adams R., Finn P., Moes E., Flannery K., Rizzo A. S. (2009). Distractibility in attention/deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): the virtual reality classroom. Child Neuropsychol. 15, 120–135. 10.1080/09297040802169077 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adolphs R. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience: cognitive neuroscience of human social behavior. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 165–178. 10.1038/nrn1056 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adolphs R. (2009). The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60:693. 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163514 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adolphs R. (2010). Conceptual challenges and directions for social neuroscience. Neuron 65, 752–767. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alderman N., Burgess P. W., Knight C., Henman C. (2003). Ecological validity of a simplified version of the multiple errands shopping test. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 9, 31–44. 10.1017/s1355617703910046 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources