Listeners Exploit Syntactic Structure On-Line to Restrict Their Lexical Search to a Subclass of Verbs
- PMID: 26696917
- PMCID: PMC4678230
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01841
Listeners Exploit Syntactic Structure On-Line to Restrict Their Lexical Search to a Subclass of Verbs
Abstract
Many experiments have shown that listeners actively build expectations about up-coming words, rather than simply waiting for information to accumulate. The online construction of a syntactic structure is one of the cues that listeners may use to construct strong expectations about the possible words they will be exposed to. For example, speakers of verb-final languages use pre-verbal arguments to predict on-line the kind of arguments that are likely to occur next (e.g., Kamide, 2008, for a review). Although in SVO languages information about a verb's arguments typically follows the verb, some languages use pre-verbal object pronouns, potentially allowing listeners to build on-line expectations about the nature of the upcoming verb. For instance, if a pre-verbal direct object pronoun is heard, then the following verb has to be able to enter a transitive structure, thus excluding intransitive verbs. To test this, we used French, in which object pronouns have to appear pre-verbally, to investigate whether listeners use this cue to predict the occurrence of a transitive verb. In a word detection task, we measured the number of false alarms to sentences that contained a transitive verb whose first syllable was homophonous to the target monosyllabic verb (e.g., target "dort" /dɔʁ/ to sleep and false alarm verb "dorlote" /dɔʁlɔt/ to cuddle). The crucial comparison involved two sentence types, one without a pre-verbal object clitic, for which an intransitive verb was temporarily a plausible option (e.g., "Il dorlote" / He cuddles) and the other with a pre-verbal object clitic, that made the appearance of an intransitive verb impossible ("Il le dorlote" / He cuddles it). Results showed a lower rate of false alarms for sentences with a pre-verbal object pronoun (3%) compared to locally ambiguous sentences (about 20%). Participants rapidly incorporate information about a verb's argument structure to constrain lexical access to verbs that match the expected subcategorization frame.
Keywords: lexical search; linguistic expectation; on-line syntactic structure construction; verb argument structure.
Figures

Similar articles
-
L2 Learners Do Not Ignore Verb's Subcategorization Information in Real-Time Syntactic Processing.Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 20;12:689137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689137. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35126219 Free PMC article.
-
Verbal Semantics Drives Early Anticipatory Eye Movements during the Comprehension of Verb-Initial Sentences.Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 9;7:95. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00095. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 26903903 Free PMC article.
-
Verb Transitivity Bias Affects On-line Sentence Reading in People with Aphasia.Aphasiology. 2013 Mar 1;27(3):326-343. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2012.725243. Epub 2012 Nov 1. Aphasiology. 2013. PMID: 23554543 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of syntactic and semantic argument structure on sentence repetition in agrammatism: Things we can learn from particles and prepositions.Aphasiology. 2011;25(6-7):736-747. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2010.537348. Epub 2011 Jan 10. Aphasiology. 2011. PMID: 28133406 Free PMC article.
-
Mapping sentence form onto meaning: the syntax-semantic interface.Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.038. Epub 2006 Sep 7. Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 16956590 Review.
Cited by
-
Prediction Signatures in the Brain: Semantic Pre-Activation during Language Comprehension.Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Nov 15;10:591. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00591. eCollection 2016. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27895573 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bates D., Sarkar D. (2007). lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using S4 Classes. (Version 0.9975-12) [R package]. Available online at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/
-
- Boersma P., Weenink D. (2015). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer Program]. Version 5.4.09, retrieved 1 June 2015. Available online at: http://www.praat.org/
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources