Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec 23;5(12):e010559.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010559.

Integrated Primary Care Teams (IPCT) pilot project in Quebec: a protocol paper

Affiliations

Integrated Primary Care Teams (IPCT) pilot project in Quebec: a protocol paper

Damien Contandriopoulos et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: The overall aim of this project is to help develop knowledge about primary care delivery models likely to improve the accessibility, quality and efficiency of care. Operationally, this objective will be achieved through supporting and evaluating 8 primary care team pilot sites that rely on an expanded nursing role within a more intensive team-based, interdisciplinary setting.

Methods and analysis: The first research component is aimed at supporting the development and implementation of the pilot projects, and is divided into 2 parts. The first part is a logical analysis based on interpreting available scientific data to understand the causal processes by which the objectives of the intervention being studied may be achieved. The second part is a developmental evaluation to support teams in the field in a participatory manner and thereby learn from experience. Operationally, the developmental evaluation phase mainly involves semistructured interviews. The second component of the project design focuses on evaluating pilot project results and assessing their costs. This component is in turn made up of 2 parts. Part 1 is a pre-and-post survey of patients receiving the intervention care to analyse their care experience. In part 2, each patient enrolled in part 1 (around 4000 patients) will be matched with 2 patients followed within a traditional primary care model, so that a comparative analysis of the accessibility, quality and efficiency of the intervention can be performed. The cohorts formed in this way will be followed longitudinally for 4 years.

Ethics and dissemination: The project, as well as all consent forms and research tools, have been accepted by 2 health sciences research ethics committees. The procedures used will conform to best practices regarding the anonymity of patients.

Keywords: PRIMARY CARE; interdisciplinarity; primary healthcare team.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptualising performance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Design structure for effects analysis (IPCT, Integrated Primary Care Team).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Davis K. Learning from high performance health systems around the globe, invited testimony: Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee Hearing “Health Care for All Americans: Challenges and Opportunities”. The Commonwealth Fund, 2007.
    1. Evans RG. Fellow travelers on a contested path: power, purpose, and the evolution of European health care systems. J Health Polit Policy Law 2005;30:277–93. 10.1215/03616878-30-1-2-277 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kotzian P. Control and performance of health care systems. A comparative analysis of 19 OECD countries. Int J Health Plann Manage 2008;23:235–57. 10.1002/hpm.946 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mechanic D. The truth about health care: why reform is not working in America (critical issues in health and medicine). Camden: Rutgers University Press, 2008.
    1. Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D et al. . A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Aff 2012;31:2805–16. 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0884 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources