Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct-Dec;31(4):547-53.
doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.169087.

Basics, common errors and essentials of statistical tools and techniques in anesthesiology research

Affiliations

Basics, common errors and essentials of statistical tools and techniques in anesthesiology research

Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

The statistical portion is a vital component of any research study. The research methodology and the application of statistical tools and techniques have evolved over the years and have significantly helped the research activities throughout the globe. The results and inferences are not accurately possible without proper validation with various statistical tools and tests. The evidencebased anesthesia research and practice has to incorporate statistical tools in the methodology right from the planning stage of the study itself. Though the medical fraternity is well acquainted with the significance of statistics in research, there is a lack of in-depth knowledge about the various statistical concepts and principles among majority of the researchers. The clinical impact and consequences can be serious as the incorrect analysis, conclusions, and false results may construct an artificial platform on which future research activities are replicated. The present tutorial is an attempt to make anesthesiologists aware of the various aspects of statistical methods used in evidence-based research and also to highlight the common areas where maximum number of statistical errors are committed so as to adopt better statistical practices.

Keywords: Confidence interval; research studies; statistics; study design; type-I error; type-II error.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A general classification of epidemiological research studies
Figure 2
Figure 2
Showing a bell-shaped curve of normal (Gaussian) distribution of the data

References

    1. Altman DG. Statistics in medical journals: Some recent trends. Stat Med. 2000;19:3275–89. - PubMed
    1. Pocock SJ, Hughes MD, Lee RJ. Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:426–32. - PubMed
    1. McKinney WP, Young MJ, Hartz A, Lee MB. The inexact use of Fisher's Exact Test in six major medical journals. JAMA. 1989;261:3430–3. - PubMed
    1. García-Berthou E, Alcaraz C. Incongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papers. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4:13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cooper RJ, Schriger DL, Close RJ. Graphical literacy: The quality of graphs in a large-circulation journal. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40:317–22. - PubMed