Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2015 Oct;41(10):2190-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.001.

Intraocular lens power calculation in cases with posterior keratoconus

Affiliations
Case Reports

Intraocular lens power calculation in cases with posterior keratoconus

Akeno Tamaoki et al. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the calculation errors of intraocular lens (IOL) power in patients with posterior keratoconus and to determine which corneal refractive power is suitable for these calculations.

Setting: Chukyo Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

Design: Retrospective case series.

Methods: This retrospective chart review was performed to identify eyes diagnosed with posterior keratoconus using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). The keratometry (K) values were measured using an autokeratometer and partial coherence interferometry (PCI) (IOLMaster). The AS-OCT measured the total refractive corneal power and the anterior to posterior corneal curvature (A/P) ratio. Predicted refractive errors were calculated from K values based on the postoperative subjective refractive errors.

Results: The chart review of 4621 eyes found that 4 eyes of 4 patients (mean age 74.8 years ± 13.0 [SD]) were diagnosed with posterior keratoconus. The total refractive corneal power values were the smallest among all of the corneal refractive powers in all 4 eyes. The preoperative A/P ratio was 1.45 (Case 1), 1.26 (Case 2), 1.25 (Case 3), and 1.44 (Case 4). When the PCI measured K values were applied for the IOL power calculations, all of the eyes became hyperopic with postoperative refractive errors of +1.51 diopters (D) (Case 1), +0.34 D (Case 2), +0.97 D (Case 3), and +1.08 D (Case 4). When the total refractive corneal power values were applied, the errors were +0.10 D (Case 1), -0.18 D (Case 2), -0.61 D (Case 3), and -0.65 D (Case 4).

Conclusion: The real corneal power values that take both the anterior and posterior corneal curvatures into consideration should be applied for IOL power calculations in cases with posterior keratoconus.

Financial disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms