Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec 24:8:228.
doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0419-4. eCollection 2015.

Lignocellulose conversion for biofuel: a new pretreatment greatly improves downstream biocatalytic hydrolysis of various lignocellulosic materials

Affiliations

Lignocellulose conversion for biofuel: a new pretreatment greatly improves downstream biocatalytic hydrolysis of various lignocellulosic materials

Seung Gon Wi et al. Biotechnol Biofuels. .

Abstract

Background: Lignocellulosic biomass is an attractive renewable resource for future liquid transport fuel. Efficient and cost-effective production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass depends on the development of a suitable pretreatment system. The aim of this study is to investigate a new pretreatment method that is highly efficient and effective for downstream biocatalytic hydrolysis of various lignocellulosic biomass materials, which can accelerate bioethanol commercialization.

Results: The optimal conditions for the hydrogen peroxide-acetic acid (HPAC) pretreatment were 80 °C, 2 h, and an equal volume mixture of H2O2 and CH3COOH. Compared to organo-solvent pretreatment under the same conditions, the HPAC pretreatment was more effective at increasing enzymatic digestibility. After HPAC treatment, the composition of the recovered solid was 74.0 % cellulose, 20.0 % hemicelluloses, and 0.9 % lignin. Notably, 97.2 % of the lignin was removed with HPAC pretreatment. Fermentation of the hydrolyzates by S. cerevisiae resulted in 412 mL ethanol kg(-1) of biomass after 24 h, which was equivalent to 85.0 % of the maximum theoretical yield (based on the amount of glucose in the raw material).

Conclusion: The newly developed HPAC pretreatment was highly effective for removing lignin from lignocellulosic cell walls, resulting in enhanced enzymatic accessibility of the substrate and more efficient cellulose hydrolysis. This pretreatment produced less amounts of fermentative inhibitory compounds. In addition, HPAC pretreatment enables year-round operations, maximizing utilization of lignocellulosic biomass from various plant sources.

Keywords: Bioethanol; Energy efficiency; Lignocellulosic biomass; Pretreatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A proposed conceptual model for the mechanism of enhanced enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass by delignification using the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-acetic acid (CH3COOH) (HPAC) pretreatment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Effect of different volume ratios of hydrogen peroxide/acetic acid. (Conditions: temperature, 80 °C; time, 2 h) b Effects of temperature on relative conversion to sugars. (Substrate: pine wood, Conditions: volume ratio of hydrogen peroxide/acetic acid, 5:5; time, 2 h) c Solid recovery after the HPAC pretreatment
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Effects of different organo-solvent pretreatments on enzymatic hydrolysis of pine wood. (A acetic acid, H hydrogen peroxide, PAC peracetic acid). b Influence of different pretreatment methods on sugar yields (RS rice straw, PW pine wood, OW oak wood)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Solid 13C-NMR spectra for pretreated and untreated pine wood
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
a Conversion rate of glucose to ethanol and the concentrations of sugars and ethanol. b Time course of sugar utilization and ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae from hydrolyzate using an enzyme mixture containing cellulase (10 FPU/g DM) and xylanase (20 IU/g DM) after the HPAC pretreatment. Note: a 0 h, b 0.5 h, c 1.0 h, d 1.5 h, e 2.0 h, and f 2.5 h of HPAC pretreatment time
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Material balances for 1 kg of HPAC-pretreated lignocellulosic biomass materials extrapolated from the results of 10.0-g-dry weight scale experiments

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, Foust TD. Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuel production. Science. 2007;315:804–807. doi: 10.1126/science.1137016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sanderson K. Lignocellulose: a chewy problem. Nature. 2011;474:ss2–4. doi: 10.1038/474S012a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barakat A, Monlau F, Solhy A, Carrere H. Mechanical dissociation and fragmentation of lignocellulosic biomass: effect of initial moisture, biochemical and structural properties on energy requirement. Appl Energ. 2015;142:240–246. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.076. - DOI
    1. Lynd LR, Laser MS, Bransby D, Dale BE, Davison B, Himilton R, Himmel M, Keller M, McMillan JD, Sheehan J, Wyman CE. How biotech can transform biofuels. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:169–172. doi: 10.1038/nbt0208-169. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Somerville C, Youngs H, Taylor C, Davis SC, Long SP. Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels. Science. 2010;329:790–792. doi: 10.1126/science.1189268. - DOI - PubMed