Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;8(12):48-52.

Pseudoepitheliomatous Hyperplasia in a Red Pigment Tattoo: A Separate Entity or Hypertrophic Lichen Planus-like Reaction?

Affiliations

Pseudoepitheliomatous Hyperplasia in a Red Pigment Tattoo: A Separate Entity or Hypertrophic Lichen Planus-like Reaction?

Viktoryia Kazlouskaya et al. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Red pigment tattoos are known to cause pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia in the skin, frequently simulating squamous cell carcinoma or keratoacanthoma. Herein, the authors present two additional cases of red pigment tattoo pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia in which they noted a lichenoid tissue reaction. They reviewed the previously published cases and observed a lichenoid reaction in the histopathological images similar to hypertrophic lichen planus. The authors suggest that these reactions might best be referred to as "lichenoid reaction with pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia" or "hypertrophic lichen planus-like reaction." Accordingly, recognition of an inflammatory component may allow additional treatment options.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figures 1Aand 1B.
Figures 1Aand 1B.
Case 1. Site of red heart-shaped tattoo. (A) Verrucous plaque in the shape of a heart on the lower leg. (B) Close up view of the lesion, showing an exophytic plaque with a verrucous surface.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Case 2. Butterfly-shaped tattoo with hyperkeratotic pink to violaceous crusted nodules in areas of previously red pigment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Punch biopsy of the verrucous lesion from Case 1 demonstrating prominent PEH and lichenoid infiltrate. H&E stained sections, x40
Figure 4
Figure 4
Biopsy from Case 1. There is a prominent lichenoid tissue reaction with necrotic keratinocytes, dyskeratosis, early Max Joseph’s spaces (arrow), and tattoo pigment granules in the dermis. H&E stained sections, x400
Figure 5
Figure 5
Second biopsy from the heart-shaped tattoo in Case 1 with PEH and follicular hyperplasia. H&E stained sections, x40
Figure 6
Figure 6
Higher magnification of the second biopsy from Case 1 showing lichenoid tissue reaction and red pigment granules in the dermis. H&E stained sections, x200
Figure 7
Figure 7
Case 2. Biopsy from a nodule within the butterfly tattoo. There is epithelial hyperplasia with dilated hyperplastic infundibula. H&E stained sections, x40
Figure 8
Figure 8
High power of the Case 2 biopsy. There is a dilated infundibulum with hyperplastic changes and lichenoid tissue reaction (arrow). H&E stained sections, x200
Figure 9
Figure 9
Case 2. Sparse red pigment granules in the infiltrate. H&E stained sections, x600.

References

    1. Thum CK, Biswas A. Inflammatory complications related to tattooing: a histopathological approach based on pattern analysis. Am J Dermatopathol. 2015 Jan;37(1):54–66. - PubMed
    1. Goldberg HI. Mercurial reaction in a tattoo. Can Med Assoc J. 1959;80:203–204. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balfour E, Olhoffer I, Leffell D, Handerson T. Massive pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia: an unusual reaction to a tattoo. Am J Dermatopathol. 2003;25:338–340. - PubMed
    1. Cui W, McGregor DH, Stark SP, et al. Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia—an unusual reaction following tattoo: report of a case and review of the literature. Int J Dermatol. 2007;46:743–745. - PubMed
    1. Kluger N, Durand L, Minier-Thoumin C, et al. Pseudoepitheliomatous epidermal hyperplasia in tattoos: report of three cases. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2008;9:337–340. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources