Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;17(11):1305-1314.
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev328. Epub 2015 Dec 24.

All-cause mortality by age and gender based on coronary artery calcium scores

Rine Nakanishi  1 , Dong Li  1 , Michael J Blaha  2 , Seamus P Whelton  2 , Sirous Darabian  1 , Ferdinand R Flores  1 , Christopher Dailing  1 , Roger S Blumenthal  2 , Khurram Nasir  2   3 , Daniel S Berman  4 , Matthew J Budoff  5
Affiliations

All-cause mortality by age and gender based on coronary artery calcium scores

Rine Nakanishi et al. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Aims: Although coronary artery calcium (CAC) has been established as a robust tool for predicting total mortality during intermediate follow-up, less is known about the long-term predictive value of CAC.

Methods and results: This study included 13 092 asymptomatic patients without known cardiovascular disease who underwent a clinically indicated CAC scan. CAC was categorized as an Agatson score of 0, 1-99, 100-399, and ≥400. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality stratified by age (younger, intermediate, or older) and gender. The mean age of participants was 58 ± 11 years and 67% were men. During a median follow-up of 11.0 ± 3.2 years, there were 522 deaths (4.0%). Compared with CAC = 0, increasing CAC was associated with higher mortality rate: 1-99 [HR: 1.5, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.1-2.1]; 100-399 (HR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.3-2.5); ≥400 (HR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.9-3.6). Relative risk according to CAC category did not differ between genders. The strongest associations between CAC and mortality were observed for young and intermediate age participants. Nonetheless, the mortality rate of the older patients with CAC = 0 was far lower than that of the general US population. CAC was more predictive of long-term (15 years) than intermediate-term (5 years) mortality for men [receiver operator characteristics (ROC): 0.723 vs. 0.702] and women (ROC: 0.69 vs. 0.65).

Conclusion: CAC is strongly associated with the long-term risk of mortality in young- and middle-aged men and women. In older patients, the long-term risk stratification of CAC is lower, due principally to increased mortality rate in patients with low calcium scores; however, even in the older patients, those with absent or low CAC are at a significantly lower risk of mortality compared with the general population.

Keywords: Age; Coronary artery calcium score; Gender; Long-term mortality; Mortality risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Prevalence of CAC among men stratified by age group. (B) Prevalence of CAC among women stratified by age group. CAC, coronary artery calcium.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Prevalence of CAC among men stratified by the number of risk factors. (B) Prevalence of CAC among women stratified by the number of risk factors. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Kaplan–Meier analysis for all-cause mortality among men stratified by CAC group. (B) Kaplan–Meier analysis for all-cause mortality among women stratified by CAC group. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Annualized mortality risk per 1000 person-years stratified by age group and CAC categories among men. (B) Annualized mortality risk per 1000 person-years stratified by age group and CAC categories among women.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Annual mortality rates per 1000 person-years among men with CAC = 0 compared with those from general US population in 2012. (B) Annual mortality rates per 1000 person-years among women with CAC = 0 compared with those from general US population in 2012.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A–D) ROC curves for prediction of all-cause mortality by traditional risk factors alone and risk factors plus the CAC score among men and women at 5 years (A: men, C: women) and 15 years (B: men, D: women). Abbreviations as in Figure 1.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ et al. . Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics—2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014;129:399–410. - PubMed
    1. Kavousi M, Leening MJ, Nanchen D, Greenland P, Graham IM, Steyerberg EW et al. . Comparison of application of the ACC/AHA guidelines, adult treatment panel III guidelines, and European Society of Cardiology guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in a European cohort. JAMA 2014;311:1416–23. - PubMed
    1. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH et al. . 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:2889–934. - PubMed
    1. Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, Liu ST, Weinstein SR, Mosler TP, Tseng PH et al. . Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1860–70. - PubMed
    1. Budoff MJ, Nasir K, McClelland RL, Detrano R, Wong N, Blumenthal RS et al. . Coronary calcium predicts events better with absolute calcium scores than age-sex-race/ethnicity percentiles: Mesa (multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:345–52. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms