Economic Impact of Oritavancin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections in the Emergency Department or Observation Setting: Cost Savings Associated with Avoidable Hospitalizations
- PMID: 26708118
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.11.014
Economic Impact of Oritavancin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections in the Emergency Department or Observation Setting: Cost Savings Associated with Avoidable Hospitalizations
Abstract
Purpose: Data indicate that acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) patients without major comorbidities can be managed effectively in the outpatient setting. Because most patients with ABSSSIs present to the emergency department, it is essential that clinicians identify candidates for outpatient treatment given the substantially higher costs associated with inpatient care. We examined the potential cost avoidance associated with shifting care from inpatient treatment with vancomycin to outpatient treatment with oritavancin for ABSSSI patients without major complications or comorbidities.
Methods: A decision analytic, cost-minimization model was developed to compare costs of inpatient vancomycin versus outpatient oritavancin treatment of ABSSSI patients with few or no comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≤1) and no life-threatening conditions presenting to emergency department. Hospital discharge data from the Premier Research Database was used to determine the costs associated with inpatient vancomycin treatment.
Findings: Mean costs for inpatient treatment with vancomycin ranged from $5973 to $9885, depending on Charlson Comorbidity Index score and presence of systemic symptoms. Switching an individual patient from inpatient vancomycin treatment to outpatient oritavancin treatment was estimated to save $1752.46 to $6475.87 per patient, depending on Charlson Comorbidity Index score, presence of systemic symptoms, and use of observation status. Assuming some patients may be admitted to the hospital after treatment with oritavancin, it is estimated that up to 38.12% of patients could be admitted while maintaining budget neutrality.
Implications: This cost-minimization model indicates that use of oritavancin in the emergency department or observation setting is associated with substantial cost savings compared with inpatient treatment with vancomycin.
Keywords: ABSSSI; Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure; Infections; oritavancin vancomycin cost impact.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Use of Oritavancin in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections Patients Receiving Intravenous Antibiotics: A US Hospital Budget Impact Analysis.Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Feb;36(2):157-68. doi: 10.1007/s40261-015-0365-8. Clin Drug Investig. 2016. PMID: 26692006 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the economic value of avoiding hospital admissions by shifting the management of gram+ acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections to an outpatient care setting.J Med Econ. 2015;18(12):1092-101. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1078339. Epub 2015 Sep 14. J Med Econ. 2015. PMID: 26368787
-
Use of Oritavancin in Moderate-to-Severe ABSSSI Patients Requiring IV Antibiotics: A U.S. Payer Budget Impact Analysis.J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jun;22(6):752-64. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.6.752. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016. PMID: 27231802 Free PMC article.
-
Oritavancin for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015 May;16(7):1091-8. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1026256. Epub 2015 Mar 24. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015. PMID: 25803197 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Oritavancin, a single-dose, complete regimen, for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015 Apr;13(4):409-16. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2015.1012498. Epub 2015 Feb 9. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015. PMID: 25661747 Review.
Cited by
-
Potential Cost-Savings with Once-Daily Aminomethylcycline Antibiotic versus Vancomycin in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.Am Health Drug Benefits. 2018 Dec;11(9):449-459. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2018. PMID: 30746017 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Outcomes and Economic Impact of Oritavancin for Gram-Positive Infections: A Single Academic Medical Center Health System Experience.Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2020 Jun;7(Suppl 1):13-19. doi: 10.1007/s40801-020-00192-w. Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 32592120 Free PMC article.
-
Finding the niche: An interprofessional approach to defining oritavancin use criteria in the emergency department.Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;38(2):321-324. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158442. Epub 2019 Sep 12. Am J Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 31839519 Free PMC article.
-
Dalbavancin Reduces Hospital Stay and Improves Productivity for Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: The ENHANCE Trial.Infect Dis Ther. 2020 Mar;9(1):53-67. doi: 10.1007/s40121-019-00275-4. Epub 2019 Nov 11. Infect Dis Ther. 2020. PMID: 31713130 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative efficacy of delafloxacin for complicated and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: results from a network meta-analysis.BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;21(1):1036. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06736-x. BMC Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 34610820 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical