Action or attention in social inhibition of return?
- PMID: 26708498
- DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0738-x
Action or attention in social inhibition of return?
Abstract
When two individuals alternate reaching responses to targets located in a visual display, reaction times are longer when responses are directed to where the co-actor just responded. Although an abundance of work has examined the many characteristics of this phenomenon it is not yet known why the effect occurs. In particular, some authors have argued that action representation mechanisms are central to the effect. However, here we present evidence in support of an account in which the representation of action is not necessary. First, the basic effect occurs even when participants cannot see their co-actor's movement but, importantly, have their attention shifted to a target side via an attentional cue. Second, its time course is too short-lasting to function effectively as a component of action planning. Finally, unlike other joint action phenomena, the effect is not modulated by higher order mechanisms concerned with the personal attributes of a co-actor. Taken together, these results suggest that this particular joint action phenomenon is due to attentional rather than action mechanisms.
Similar articles
-
Attention allocation in complementary joint action: How joint goals affect spatial orienting.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1574-1593. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02779-1. Epub 2023 Sep 8. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024. PMID: 37684501 Free PMC article.
-
Is social inhibition of return due to action co-representation?Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jul;150:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 May 21. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014. PMID: 24859672
-
The role of attention in a joint-action effect.PLoS One. 2014 Mar 18;9(3):e91336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091336. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24642806 Free PMC article.
-
Response-specific effects in a joint action task: social inhibition of return effects do not emerge when observed and executed actions are different.Psychol Res. 2017 Sep;81(5):1059-1071. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0794-x. Epub 2016 Aug 16. Psychol Res. 2017. PMID: 27530404
-
Sharing tasks or sharing actions? Evidence from the joint Simon task.Psychol Res. 2018 Mar;82(2):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0821-y. Epub 2016 Nov 8. Psychol Res. 2018. PMID: 27826655 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Social Beliefs and Visual Attention: How the Social Relevance of a Cue Influences Spatial Orienting.Cogn Sci. 2018 May;42 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):161-185. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12529. Epub 2017 Nov 2. Cogn Sci. 2018. PMID: 29094383 Free PMC article.
-
Visual attention and action: How cueing, direct mapping, and social interactions drive orienting.Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1585-1605. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1354-0. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018. PMID: 28808932 Review.
-
Attention allocation in complementary joint action: How joint goals affect spatial orienting.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1574-1593. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02779-1. Epub 2023 Sep 8. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024. PMID: 37684501 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical