[Identifying gaps between guidelines and clinical practice in Clostridium difficile infection]
- PMID: 26708998
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cali.2015.09.009
[Identifying gaps between guidelines and clinical practice in Clostridium difficile infection]
Abstract
Objectives: The first aim was to determine whether patients are being treated in accordance with the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA/SHEA) Clostridium difficile guidelines and whether adherence impacts patient outcomes. The second aim was to identify specific action items in the guidelines that are not being translated into clinical practice, for their subsequent implementation.
Material and methods: A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted over a 36 month period, on patients with compatible clinical symptoms and positive test for C. difficile toxins A and/or B in stool samples, in an internal medicine department of a tertiary medical centre. Patient demographic and clinical data (outcomes, comorbidity, risk factors) and compliance with guidelines, were examined
Results: A total of 77 patients with C. difficile infection were identified (87 episodes). Stratified by disease severity criteria, 49.3% of patients were mild-moderate, 35.1% severe, and 15.6% severe-complicated. Full adherence with the guidelines was observed in only 40.2% of patients, and was significantly better for mild-moderate (71.0%), than in severe (7.4%) or severe-complicated patients (16.6%) (P<.003). Adherence was significantly associated with clinical cure (57% vs 42%), fewer recurrences (22.2% vs 77.7%), and mortality (25% vs 75%) (P<.01). The stratification of severity of the episode, and the adequacy of antibiotic to clinical severity, need improvement.
Conclusions: Overall adherence with the guidelines for management of Clostridium difficile infection was poor, especially in severe and severe-complicated patients, being associated with worse clinical outcomes. Educational interventions aimed at improving guideline adherence are warranted.
Keywords: Adherence; Adherencia; Antimicrobial use; Clostridium difficile infection; Guidelines; Guías de práctica clínica; Infección por Clostridium difficile; Utilización de antimicrobianos.
Copyright © 2015 SECA. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Effect of treatment variation on outcomes in patients with Clostridium difficile.Am J Med. 2014 Sep;127(9):865-70. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.05.016. Epub 2014 May 23. Am J Med. 2014. PMID: 24862310
-
Clostridium difficile-associated disease: adherence with current guidelines at a tertiary medical center.World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 14;19(46):8647-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8647. World J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 24379582 Free PMC article.
-
A Retrospective Study of Patient Factors That Indicate Provider Nonadherence to an Institutional Clostridium difficile Treatment Guideline.J Pharm Pract. 2018 Apr;31(2):169-174. doi: 10.1177/0897190017710349. Epub 2017 Jun 1. J Pharm Pract. 2018. PMID: 28569127
-
Clostridium difficile infection in older adults: a review and update on its management.Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012 Feb;10(1):14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Jan 20. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012. PMID: 22260856 Review.
-
The potential for emerging therapeutic options for Clostridium difficile infection.Gut Microbes. 2014;5(6):696-710. doi: 10.4161/19490976.2014.983768. Gut Microbes. 2014. PMID: 25564777 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A Comparison of Current Guidelines of Five International Societies on Clostridium difficile Infection Management.Infect Dis Ther. 2016 Sep;5(3):207-30. doi: 10.1007/s40121-016-0122-1. Epub 2016 Jul 28. Infect Dis Ther. 2016. PMID: 27470257 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources