Risks Associated With Anesthesia Services During Colonoscopy
- PMID: 26709032
- PMCID: PMC4887133
- DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.12.018
Risks Associated With Anesthesia Services During Colonoscopy
Abstract
Background & aims: We aimed to quantify the difference in complications from colonoscopy with vs without anesthesia services.
Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study and analyzed administrative claims data from Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Research Databases from 2008 through 2011. We identified 3,168,228 colonoscopy procedures in men and women, aged 40-64 years old. Colonoscopy complications were measured within 30 days, including colonic (ie, perforation, hemorrhage, abdominal pain), anesthesia-associated (ie, pneumonia, infection, complications secondary to anesthesia), and cardiopulmonary outcomes (ie, hypotension, myocardial infarction, stroke), adjusted for age, sex, polypectomy status, Charlson comorbidity score, region, and calendar year.
Results: Nationwide, 34.4% of colonoscopies were conducted with anesthesia services. Rates of use varied significantly by region (53% in the Northeast vs 8% in the West; P < .0001). Use of anesthesia service was associated with a 13% increase in the risk of any complication within 30 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.14), and was associated specifically with an increased risk of perforation (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% CI, 1.00-1.15), hemorrhage (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.27-1.30), abdominal pain (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.08), complications secondary to anesthesia (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28), and stroke (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.08). For most outcomes, there were no differences in risk with anesthesia services by polypectomy status. However, the risk of perforation associated with anesthesia services was increased only in patients with a polypectomy (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09-1.52). In the Northeast, use of anesthesia services was associated with a 12% increase in risk of any complication; among colonoscopies performed in the West, use of anesthesia services was associated with a 60% increase in risk.
Conclusions: The overall risk of complications after colonoscopy increases when individuals receive anesthesia services. The widespread adoption of anesthesia services with colonoscopy should be considered within the context of all potential risks.
Keywords: Anesthesia Services; Endoscopy; Gastroenterology; Propofol.
Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors disclose no conflicts.
Figures
Comment in
-
Anesthetist-Directed Sedation for Colonoscopy: A Safe Haven or Siren's Song?Gastroenterology. 2016 Apr;150(4):801-3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.058. Epub 2016 Feb 26. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 26924093 No abstract available.
-
Complications and Anesthesia for Colonoscopy: Culprit or Accomplice?Gastroenterology. 2016 Sep;151(3):559-60. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.05.058. Epub 2016 Jul 30. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 27485645 No abstract available.
-
Limitations to an Important Study on the Risks of Colonoscopy With Anesthesia Services.Gastroenterology. 2016 Sep;151(3):563. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.05.056. Epub 2016 Jul 30. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 27485646 No abstract available.
-
Forward Progress of Sedation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Requires Taking a Step Back.Gastroenterology. 2016 Sep;151(3):562-3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.091. Epub 2016 Jul 30. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 27485651 No abstract available.
-
Anesthesia Services Increase Risk Of Complications After Colonoscopy: We Are Not Sure!Gastroenterology. 2016 Sep;151(3):560-1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.04.053. Epub 2016 Jul 30. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 27485653 No abstract available.
-
Anesthesia's Impact on Outcomes After Endoscopy: More Research Is Needed.Gastroenterology. 2016 Sep;151(3):559. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.05.057. Epub 2016 Jul 30. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 27485654 No abstract available.
-
Anesthesia Services Are Beneficial for Colonoscopy in Interventional Gastroenterology.Gastroenterology. 2016 Sep;151(3):561-2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.092. Epub 2016 Jul 30. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 27485655 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Gastroenterology. 2016 Sep;151(3):564. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.07.041. Epub 2016 Aug 3. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 27496674 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Joseph DA, King JB, Miller JW, et al. Prevalence of colorectal cancer screening among adults–Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61(Suppl):51–56. - PubMed
-
- Vargo JJ, Cohen LB, Rex DK, et al. Position statement: nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:2161–2167. - PubMed
-
- Liu H, Waxman DA, Main R, et al. Utilization of anesthesia services during outpatient endoscopies and colonoscopies and associated spending in 2003–2009. JAMA. 2012;307:1178–1184. - PubMed
-
- Inadomi JM, Gunnarsson CL, Rizzo JA, et al. Projected increased growth rate of anesthesia professional-delivered sedation for colonoscopy and EGD in the United States: 2009 to 2015. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:580–586. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
