Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015:24:46-53.
doi: 10.1007/s40629-015-0046-4. Epub 2015 Mar 14.

Comparison of molecular and extract-based allergy diagnostics with multiplex and singleplex analysis

Affiliations

Comparison of molecular and extract-based allergy diagnostics with multiplex and singleplex analysis

Johannes Huss-Marp et al. Allergo J Int. 2015.

Abstract

Background: ImmunoCAP ISAC 112, is a commercially available molecular allergy IgE multiplex test. Data on the comparison of this rather novel test with extract-based as well as molecular ImmunoCAP singleplex IgE tests is missing.

Objective: To perform a comparison between the ISAC multiplex IgE assay and the ImmunoCAP singleplex test results.

Methods: Serum samples of 101 adults with grass pollen allergy were analysed for sIgE to 112 allergenic molecules represented on the ISAC test as well as to common atopy-related extract-based allergy tests with the ImmunoCAP System (house dust mite [d1], cat [e1], dog [e5], cow's milk [f2], hen's egg [f1], hazelnut [f17], celery [f85], Alternaria alternate [m6], as well as pollen from birch [t3], hazel [t4], mugwort [w6], and ragweed [w1]). Subsequently statistical analysis was performed with the Spearman rank correlation test and the Clopper-Pearson method in order to compare the ISAC multiplex results with the sIgE singleplex results.

Results: The positive percent agreements (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) of corresponding allergens between the ISAC sIgE test and the extract-based singleplex ImmunoCAP results at cutoff 0.1 kUA/l varied between 60-100 % for PPA and 78-97 % for NPA.

Conclusion: When taking into account corresponding allergens molecular testing with the ISAC multiplex test correlates well with ImmunoCAP singleplex results.

Keywords: ISAC; Immuno-CAP; Molecular allergy diagnostics; allergens; component resolved diagnosis; extract-based diagnostics; singleplex multiplex; specific IgE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1. a-h
Fig. 1. a-h
Comparison of sIgE results obtained with the ImmunoCAP ISAC test with 8 extract-based ImmunoCAP singelplex tests (n = 101).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Canonica GW, Ansotegui IJ, Pawankar R, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, van Hage M, Baena-Cagnani CE, Melioli G, Nunes C, Passalacqua G, Rosenwasser L, Sampson H, Sastre J, Bousquet J, Zuberbier T. A WAO - ARIA - GA(2)LEN consensus document on molecular-based allergy diagnostics. World Allergy Organ J. 2013;6:17. doi: 10.1186/1939-4551-6-17. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Szecsi PB, Stender S. Comparison of immunoglobulin E measurements on IMMULITE and ImmunoCAP in samples consisting of allergen-specific mouse-human chimeric monoclonal antibodies towards allergen extracts and four recombinant allergens. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2013;162:131–4. doi: 10.1159/000353276. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wood RA, Segall N, Ahlstedt S, Williams PB. Accuracy of IgE antibody laboratory results. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2007;99:34–41. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60618-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cabrera-Freitag P, Goikoetxea MJ, Beorlegui C, Gamboa P, Gastaminza G, Fernandez-Benitez M, Ferrer M, Blanca M, Sanz ML. Can component-based microarray replace fluorescent enzimoimmunoassay in the diagnosis of grass and cypress pollen allergy? Clin Exp Allergy. 2011;41:1440–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03818.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gadisseur R, Chapelle JP, Cavalier E. A new tool in the field of in-vitro diagnosis of allergy: preliminary results in the comparison of ImmunoCAP(c) 250 with the ImmunoCAP(c) ISAC. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:277–80. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.052. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources