Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Jan;137(1):12-18.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001847.

The Impact of Travel Distance on Breast Reconstruction in the United States

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The Impact of Travel Distance on Breast Reconstruction in the United States

Claudia R Albornoz et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Inadequate access to breast reconstruction was a motivating factor underlying passage of the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act. It remains unclear whether all patients interested in breast reconstruction undergo this procedure. The aim of this study was to determine whether geographic disparities are present that limit the rate and method of postmastectomy reconstruction.

Methods: Travel distance in miles between the patient's residence and the hospital reporting the case was used as a quantitative measure of geographic disparities. The American College of Surgeons National Cancer Database was queried for mastectomy with or without reconstruction performed from 1998 to 2011. Reconstructive procedures were categorized as implant or autologous techniques. Standard statistical tests including linear regression were performed.

Results: Patients who underwent breast reconstruction had to travel farther than those who had mastectomy alone (p < 0.01). A linear correlation was demonstrated between travel distance and reconstruction rates (p < 0.01). The mean distances traveled by patients who underwent reconstruction at community, comprehensive community, or academic programs were 10.3, 19.9, and 26.2 miles, respectively (p < 0.01). Reconstruction rates were significantly greater at academic programs. Patients traveled farther to undergo autologous compared with prosthetic reconstruction.

Conclusions: Although greater patient awareness and insurance coverage have contributed to increased breast reconstruction rates in the United States, the presence of geographic barriers suggests an unmet need. Academic programs have the greatest reconstruction rates, but are located farther from patients' residences. Increasing the number of plastics surgeons, especially in community centers, would be one method of addressing this inequality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Travel distance for immediate breast reconstruction.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Immediate reconstruction rates and travel distance by cancer program type.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Travel distance for high-volume autologous centers.

Comment in

References

    1. Gulliford M, Figueroa-Munoz J, Morgan M, et al. What does ‘access to health care’ mean? J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002;7:186–188. - PubMed
    1. Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Health-Insurance-Reform/Heal.... Accessed.
    1. Lentol J. Information and Access to Breast Reconstructive Surgery Law. Committee on Codes. Chapter 354; Health. A.10094-B/S.6993-B. Available at: http://assembly.state.ny.us/comm/Codes/2010Annual/index.pdf. Accessed.
    1. Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Pusic AL, et al. The influence of sociodemographic factors and hospital characteristics on the method of breast reconstruction, including microsurgery: A U.S. population-based study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:1071–1079. - PubMed
    1. Shippee TP, Kozhimannil KB, Rowan K, Virnig BA. Health insurance coverage and racial disparities in breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Womens Health Issues. 2014;24:e261–e269. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms