Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Dec 28;10(12):e0145318.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145318. eCollection 2015.

A Randomized Trial of Pharmacogenetic Warfarin Dosing in Naïve Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A Randomized Trial of Pharmacogenetic Warfarin Dosing in Naïve Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Vittorio Pengo et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Genotype-guided warfarin dosing have been proposed to improve patient’s management. This study is aimed to determine whether a CYP2C9- VKORC1- CYP4F2-based pharmacogenetic algorithm is superior to a standard, clinically adopted, pharmacodynamic method. Two-hundred naïve patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation were randomized to trial arms and 180 completed the study. No significant differences were found in the number of out-of-range INRs (INR<2.0 or >3.0) (p = 0.79) and in the mean percentage of time spent in the therapeutic range (TTR) after 19 days in the pharmacogenetic (51.9%) and in the control arm (53.2%, p = 0.71). The percentage of time spent at INR>4.0 was significantly lower in the pharmacogenetic (0.7%) than in the control arm (1.8%) (p = 0.02). Genotype-guided warfarin dosing is not superior in overall anticoagulation control when compared to accurate clinical standard of care.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01178034.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study Flow diagram.
–The diagram shows the progress through the phases of the randomized trial: enrolment, intervention allocation, follow-up, and data analysis.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Percentage of Time in the Therapeutic INR Range according to subgroup.
The percentage of time in the therapeutic INR range for pharmacogenetic arm (Genotype guided group) and control arm (Control group) are shown over the 19 day observational period.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Overall mean INR variations according to subgroup.
Comparison of finding in the pharmacogenetic arm (section A, Genotype guided group) and control arm (section B, Control group) during the 0–19 day time frame. The bars denote Standard Deviations, the dotted lines indicate the therapeutic margins. INR = International Normalized Ratio.

References

    1. Palareti G, Leali N, Coccheri S, Poggi M, Manotti C, D'Angelo A, et al. Bleeding complications of oral anticoagulant treatment: an inception-cohort, prospective collaborative study (ISCOAT). Italian Study on Complications of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy. Lancet. 1996; 348: 423–428. - PubMed
    1. Eriksson N, Wadelius M. Prediction of warfarin dose: why, when and how? Pharmacogenomics. 2012; 13: 429–440. 10.2217/pgs.11.184 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scordo M.G, Pengo V, Spina E, Dahl ML, Gusella M, Padrini R. Influence of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms on warfarin maintenance dose and metabolic clearance. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002; 72: 702–710. - PubMed
    1. D'Andrea G, D'Ambrosio RL, Di Perna P, Chetta M, Santacroce R, Brancaccio V, et al. A polymorphism in the VKORC1 gene is associated with an interindividual variability in the dose-anticoagulant effect of warfarin. Blood. 2005; 105: 645–649. - PubMed
    1. Caldwell MD, Awad T, Johnson JA, Gage BF, Falkowski M, Gardina P, et al. CYP4F2 genetic variant alters required warfarin dose. Blood. 2008; 111: 4106–4112. 10.1182/blood-2007-11-122010 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data