Clinical impact of bone marrow morphology for the diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia: comparison between the BCSH and the WHO criteria
- PMID: 26710883
- PMCID: PMC4858583
- DOI: 10.1038/leu.2015.360
Clinical impact of bone marrow morphology for the diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia: comparison between the BCSH and the WHO criteria
Erratum in
-
Clinical impact of bone marrow morphology for the diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia: comparison between the BCSH and the WHO criteria.Leukemia. 2017 Mar;31(3):774-775. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.291. Leukemia. 2017. PMID: 28248312 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is currently diagnosed either by the British Committee of Standards in Haematology (BCSH) criteria that are predominantly based on exclusion and not necessarily on bone marrow (BM) morphology, or the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria that require BM examination as essential criterion. We studied the morphological and clinical features in patients diagnosed according either to the BCSH (n=238) or the WHO guidelines (n=232). The BCSH-defined ET cohort was re-evaluated by applying the WHO classification. At presentation, patients of the BCSH group showed significantly higher values of serum lactate dehydrogenase and had palpable splenomegaly more frequently. Following the WHO criteria, the re-evaluation of the BCSH-diagnosed ET cohort displayed a heterogeneous population with 141 (59.2%) ET, 77 (32.4%) prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (prePMF), 16 (6.7%) polycythemia vera and 4 (1.7%) primary myelofibrosis. Contrasting WHO-confirmed ET, the BCSH cohort revealed a significant worsening of fibrosis-free survival and prognosis. As demonstrated by the clinical data and different outcomes between WHO-diagnosed ET and prePMF, these adverse features were generated by the inadvertent inclusion of prePMF to the BCSH group. Taken together, the diagnosis of ET without a scrutinized examination of BM biopsy specimens will generate a heterogeneous cohort of patients impairing an appropriate clinical management.
Figures

Comment in
-
Equivalence of BCSH and WHO diagnostic criteria for ET.Leukemia. 2017 Feb;31(2):527-528. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.318. Epub 2016 Nov 29. Leukemia. 2017. PMID: 27895337 No abstract available.
References
-
- Harrison CN, Bareford D, Butt N, Campbell P, Conneally E, Drummond M et al. Guideline for investigation and management of adults and children presenting with a thrombocytosis. Br J Haematol 2010; 149: 352–375. - PubMed
-
- Harrison CN, Butt N, Campbell P, Conneally E, Drummond M, Green AR et al. Modification of British Committee for Standards in Haematology diagnostic criteria for essential thrombocythaemia. Br J Haematol 2014; 167: 421–423. - PubMed
-
- Thiele J, Kvasnicka H, Orazi A, Tefferi A, Gisslinger H. Essential thrombocythemia. In: Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H et al (eds). WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. IARC: Lyon, France, 2008.
-
- Thiele J, Kvasnicka HM. Clinicopathological criteria for differential diagnosis of thrombocythemias in various myeloproliferative disorders. Semin Thromb Hemost 2006; 32: 219–230. - PubMed
-
- Abdulkarim K, Ridell B, Johansson P, Kutti J, Safai-Kutti S, Andréasson B. The impact of peripheral blood values and bone marrow findings on prognosis for patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera. Eur J Haematol 2011; 86: 148–155. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials