Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666
- PMID: 26712110
- PMCID: PMC5943835
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv367
Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666
Abstract
Background: Mammography is not widely available in all countries, and breast cancer incidence is increasing. We considered performance characteristics using ultrasound (US) instead of mammography to screen for breast cancer.
Methods: Two thousand eight hundred nine participants were enrolled at 20 sites in the United States, Canada, and Argentina in American College of Radiology Imaging 6666. Two thousand six hundred sixty-two participants completed three annual screens (7473 examinations) with US and film-screen (n = 4351) or digital (n = 3122) mammography and had biopsy or 12-month follow-up. Cancer detection, recall, and positive predictive values were determined. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results: One hundred ten women had 111 breast cancer events: 89 (80.2%) invasive cancers, median size 12 mm. The number of US screens to detect one cancer was 129 (95% bootstrap confidence interval [CI] = 110 to 156), and for mammography 127 (95% CI = 109 to 152). Cancer detection was comparable for each of US and mammography at 58 of 111 (52.3%) vs 59 of 111 (53.2%, P = .90), with US-detected cancers more likely invasive (53/58, 91.4%, median size 12 mm, range = 2-40 mm), vs mammography at 41 of 59 (69.5%, median size 13 mm, range = 1-55 mm, P < .001). Invasive cancers detected by US were more frequently node-negative, 34 of 53 (64.2%) vs 18 of 41 (43.9%) by mammography (P = .003). For 4814 incidence screens (years 2 and 3), US had higher recall and biopsy rates and lower PPV of biopsy (PPV3) than mammography: The recall rate was 10.7% (n = 515) vs 9.4% (n = 453, P = .03), the biopsy rate was 5.5% (n = 266) vs 2.0% (n = 97, P < .001), and PPV3 was 11.7% (31/266) vs 38.1% (37/97, P < .001).
Conclusions: Cancer detection rate with US is comparable with mammography, with a greater proportion of invasive and node-negative cancers among US detections. False positives are more common with US screening.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00072501.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Comment in
-
Ultrasound is similar to mammography in detecting breast cancer, study shows.BMJ. 2015 Dec 29;351:h6925. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6925. BMJ. 2015. PMID: 26715161 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk.JAMA. 2012 Apr 4;307(13):1394-404. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.388. JAMA. 2012. PMID: 22474203 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Digital mammography screening: how many breast cancers are additionally detected by bilateral ultrasound examination during assessment?Eur Radiol. 2013 Mar;23(3):684-91. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2664-2. Epub 2012 Oct 7. Eur Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23052645
-
Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Results After 10 Years of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222440. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2440. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35333365 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06992-1. BMC Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32487106 Free PMC article.
-
Supplemental Screening as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in People With Dense Breasts: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023 Dec 19;23(9):1-293. eCollection 2023. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023. PMID: 39364436 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Correlation of Strain Elastography with Conventional Sonography and FNAC/Biopsy.J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):TC05-10. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20239.8177. Epub 2016 Jul 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016. PMID: 27630922 Free PMC article.
-
An attention-supervised full-resolution residual network for the segmentation of breast ultrasound images.Med Phys. 2020 Nov;47(11):5702-5714. doi: 10.1002/mp.14470. Epub 2020 Oct 6. Med Phys. 2020. PMID: 32964449 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in the BI-RADS categorization of breast lesions: A pilot head to head comparison study in screening program.Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 18;10:1098639. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1098639. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36743185 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing Performance of Breast Ultrasound in Opportunistic Screening Women by a Deep Learning-Based System: A Multicenter Prospective Study.Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 10;12:804632. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.804632. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35223484 Free PMC article.
-
Palpable Breast Lump Triage by Minimally Trained Operators in Mexico Using Computer-Assisted Diagnosis and Low-Cost Ultrasound.J Glob Oncol. 2018 Aug;4:1-9. doi: 10.1200/JGO.17.00222. J Glob Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30156946 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N, Ferlay J, Forman D. Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008-2030): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol . 2012;13:790–801. - PubMed
-
- Forouzanfar MH, Foreman KJ, Delossantos AM, et al. Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis . Lancet . 2011. ; 378 ( 9801 ): 1461 – 1484 . - PubMed
-
- Mathis KL, Hoskin TL, Boughey JC, et al. Palpable presentation of breast cancer persists in the era of screening mammography . J Am Coll Surg . 2010. ; 210 ( 3 ): 314 – 318 . - PubMed
-
- Vanier A, Leux C, Allioux C, et al. Are prognostic factors more favorable for breast cancer detected by organized screening than by opportunistic screening or clinical diagnosis? A study in Loire-Atlantique (France) . Cancer Epidemiol . 2013. ; 37 ( 5 ): 683 – 687 . - PubMed
-
- Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, et al. The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up . Radiol Clin North Am . 2000. ; 38 ( 4 ): 625 – 651 . - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical