Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Feb 20;34(6):588-96.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.0987. Epub 2015 Dec 28.

Prospective Study of 68Ga-DOTATATE Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Detecting Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Unknown Primary Sites

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Prospective Study of 68Ga-DOTATATE Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Detecting Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Unknown Primary Sites

Samira M Sadowski et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) are increasing in incidence, and accurate staging is important for selecting the appropriate treatment. (68)Ga-DOTATATE imaging is a promising approach for detecting GEPNETs and could help in selecting optimal therapeutic strategies. The aim of this study was to prospectively determine the clinical utility of (68)Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in detecting unknown primary and metastatic GEPNETs.

Patients and methods: One hundred thirty-one patients were enrolled in a prospective study of patients undergoing (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, (111)In-pentetreotide single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and multiphasic CT scan, and/or magnetic resonance imaging in a blinded fashion with comprehensive biochemical testing. The primary outcome measure was the detection of lesions by each imaging study.

Results: (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging detected 95.1% of lesions (95% CI, 92.4% to 96.8%) with an average maximum standardized uptake value of 65.4 ± 47 (range, 6.9 to 244), anatomic imaging detected 45.3% of lesions (95% CI, 37.9% to 52.9%), and (111)In-pentetreotide SPECT/CT detected 30.9% of lesions (95% CI, 25.0% to 37.5%), with a significant difference between imaging modalities (P < .001). In four of 14 patients (28.6%), (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT found a previously unknown primary tumor, and detected primary GEPNET, lymph node, and distant metastases correctly in 72 of 113 lesions (63.7%) when compared with histopathology, with 22.1% and 38.9% detected by using (111)In-pentetreotide SPECT/CT and anatomic imaging, respectively. On the basis of findings with (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, 43 of 131 patients (32.8%) had a change in management recommendation. In patients with carcinoid symptoms but negative biochemical testing, (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT detected lesions in 65.2% of patients, 40% of which were detected neither by anatomic imaging nor by (111)In-pentetreotide SPECT/CT.

Conclusion: (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging provides important information for accurate staging of GEPNETs and selection of appropriate treatment interventions even in the absence of biochemical evidence of disease in symptomatic patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found in the article online at www.jco.org. Author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
There was a significant correlation between (A) chromogranin A and (B) 24-hour urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) and the number of lesions per patient found by using 68Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging (Spearman coefficient r = 0.46; P < .001; n = 128; and r = 0.43; P < .001; n = 119, respectively). Mean (C) chromogranin A and (D) 24-hour urinary 5-HIAA were significantly higher in patients with liver metastases present with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging (chromogranin A: liver positive [pos] 1083 ± 446 v liver negative [neg] 356 ± 104; Mann-Whitney P = .005; and 5-HIAA: liver positive 20 ± 5.8 v liver negative 4.7 ± 0.3; Mann-Whitney P < .001).
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
A case of a patient with known liver metastases and previously unknown primary lesion detected by 68Ga-DOTATATE positive emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). (A) 111In-Pentetreotide scan (planar) shows no pathologic uptake. (B, top) Axial CT, (middle) 111In-pentetreotide axial slice, and (bottom) fused single-photon emission CT/CT showing no pathologic uptake. (C) 68Ga-DOTATATE PET maximum-intensity projection image shows three liver metastases (black arrows) and two lesions in the abdomen (lymph node and enteric lesion; red arrows). (D) 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT image shows the mesenteric lymph node (maximum standardized uptake value, 75; red arrow). (E) Arterial phase CT shows corresponding small indeterminate lymph node (red arrow).
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Clinical management diagram on the basis of the three imaging modalities. Data are given as No. (%). CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET, positron emission tomography; PRRT, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy; SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography.
Fig A1.
Fig A1.
A 46-year-old patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and known pancreatic and duodenal lesions who had lymph nodes not previously known that were detected by using 68Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging. (A) 111In-Pentetreotide scan (planar) shows a unique unclear prerenal uptake. (B, top) Axial CT, (middle) 111In-pentetreotide axial slice, and (bottom) fused single-photo emission CT/CT showing unclear pathologic uptake (red arrow). (C) 68Ga-DOTATATE PET maximum-intensity projection image shows retropancreatic lymph node (red arrow) and duodenal and pancreatic lesions. (D) 68Ga-DOTATATE Q:17 PET/CT image shows the retropancreatic and periduodenal lymph node (maximum standardized uptake value, 96; red arrow). (E) Arterial phase CT shows corresponding lymph node (red arrow) that was read as a subcentimeter indeterminate lymph node.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tsikitis VL, Wertheim BC, Guerrero MA. Trends of incidence and survival of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors in the United States: A SEER analysis. J Cancer. 2012;3:292–302. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawrence B, Gustafsson BI, Chan A, et al. The epidemiology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2011;40:1–18. doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2010.12.005. - PubMed
    1. Duh QY, Hybarger CP, Geist R, et al. Carcinoids associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes. Am J Surg. 1987;154:142–148. - PubMed
    1. Charlesworth M, Verbeke CS, Falk GA, et al. Pancreatic lesions in von Hippel-Lindau disease? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1422–1428. - PubMed
    1. Larson AM, Hedgire SS, Deshpande V, et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. Clin Genet. 2012;82:558–563. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms