Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct-Dec;12(4):266-9.
doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.172569.

One-trocar-assisted pyeloplasty: An attractive alternative to open pyeloplasty

Affiliations

One-trocar-assisted pyeloplasty: An attractive alternative to open pyeloplasty

Antonio Marte et al. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2015 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Background: To survey the effects of one-trocar-assisted pyeloplasty (OTAP) in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in kids.

Materials and methods: Forty-four children (±3.5 years) were submitted to OTAP procedure. A flank incision under the XII rib was made, the Gerota's fascia was achieved and a balloon Hasson trocar with an operative telescope inserted for retroperitoneal access. The renal pelvis and ureter were isolated and exteriorised. Forty-two patients underwent Anderson-Hynes dismembered and one Fenger pyeloplasty . One patient was converted to an open procedure. Two patients presented an aberrant crossing vessel. In all patients, a double J stent was positioned. The operative time and length of stay (LOS) were evaluated. Renal scan and ultrasound (US) were utilised to evaluate the results from 6 to 12 months.

Results: OTAP was successful in all but 1 patient. Mean operative time and LOS were 128 min and 3,5 days. We had four operative complications (9.09%). The US and a nuclear scan confirmed the resolution of the UPJO in all patients except one with the Fenger pyeloplasty who had an open Anderson-Hynes.

Conclusions: The combination of retroperitoneoscopic and open procedures for dismembered pyeloplasty offers a simple, time-saving method in a minimally invasive fashion with low morbidity for patients with UPJO.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Retroperitoneoscopy: Renal pelvis and ureter exteriorisation
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ureteropelvic junction exposure: Stay sutures on the pelvis and the ureter for pyeloplasty
Figure 3
Figure 3
Second retroperitoneal look of pyeloplasty: Kinking of the anastomosis

Similar articles

References

    1. Peters CA, Schlussel RN, Retik AB. Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1995;153:1962–5. - PubMed
    1. Tan HL, Roberts JP. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children: Preliminary results. Br J Urol. 1996;77:909–13. - PubMed
    1. Tan HL. Laparoscopic anderson-hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 1999;162:1045–7. - PubMed
    1. Bonnard A, Fouquet V, Carricaburu E, Aigrain Y, El-Ghoneimi A. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2005;173:1710–3. - PubMed
    1. Schier F. Laparoscopic anderson-hynes pyeloplasty in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 1998;13:497–500. - PubMed