Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;5(1):55.
doi: 10.1186/s13613-015-0099-z. Epub 2015 Dec 30.

Influence of ICU-bed availability on ICU admission decisions

Affiliations

Influence of ICU-bed availability on ICU admission decisions

René Robert et al. Ann Intensive Care. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The potential influence of bed availability on triage to intensive care unit (ICU) admission is among the factors that may influence the ideal ratio of ICU beds to population: thus, high bed availability (HBA) may result in the admission of patients too well or too sick to benefit, whereas bed scarcity may result in refusal of patients likely to benefit from ICU admission.

Methods: Characteristics and outcomes of patient admitted in four ICUs with usual HBA, defined by admission refusal rate less than 11 % because of bed unavailability, were compared to patients admitted in six ICUs with usual low bed availability (LBA), i.e., an admission refusal rate higher than 10 % during a 90-day period.

Results: Over the 90 days, the mean number of days with no bed available was 30 ± 16 in HBA units versus 48 ± 21 in LBA units (p < 0.01). The proportion of admitted patients was significantly higher in the HBA (80.1 %; n = 659/823) than in the LBA units [61.6 %: n = 480/779; (p < 0.0001)]. The proportion of patients deemed too sick to benefit from admission was higher in LBA (9.0 %; n = 70) than in the HBA (6.3 %; n = 52) units (p < 0.05). The HBA group had a significantly greater proportion of patients younger than 40 years of age (22.5 %; n = 148 versus 14 %; n = 67 in LBA group; p < 0.001) and higher proportions of patients with either high or low simplified acute physiologic score II values.

Conclusions: Bed availability affected triage decisions. Units with HBA trend to admit patients too sick or too well to benefit.

Keywords: Admission; Bed occupancy; ICU; Refusal; Scarcity; Triage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart. (HBA ICU high bed availability ICU with rate of refusal <11 %; LBA ICU low bed availability ICU with rate of refusal >10 %)

References

    1. Angus DC, Kelley MA, Schmitz RJ, White A, Popovich J. For the Committee on Manpower for Pulmonary and Critical Care Societies (COMPACCS) Current and projected workforce requirements for care of the critically ill and patients with pulmonary disease: can we meet the requirements of an aging population? JAMA. 2000;284:2762–2770. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.21.2762. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rhodes A, Ferdinande P, Flaatten H, Guidet B, Metnitz PG, Moreno RP. The variability of critical care bed numbers in Europe. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:1647–1653. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2627-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garrouste-Orgeas M, Montuclard L, Timsit JF, Reignier J, Desmettre T, Karoubi P, et al. Predictors of intensive care unit refusal in French intensive care units: a multiple-center study. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:750–755. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000157752.26180.F1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Annane D, Diehl JL, Drault JN et al. Reanimation. 2012;22(Suppl 3):ppHS2-HS23.
    1. Task Force of the American College of Critical Care medicine society of critical care medicine guidelines for intensive care unit admission, discharge, and triage. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:633–638. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199903000-00048. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources