Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;14(4):448-58.
doi: 10.1080/14763141.2015.1084034.

Shooting motion in high school, collegiate, and professional men's lacrosse players

Affiliations

Shooting motion in high school, collegiate, and professional men's lacrosse players

Heather K Vincent et al. Sports Biomech. 2015.

Abstract

The purposes of this research were to quantify the kinematics of the lacrosse shot, based on arm dominance and player experience level. Male players (N = 39; 14-30 years; high school [n = 24], collegiate [n = 9], professional [n = 6]), performed overhead shots using dominant and non-dominant sides. Motion was captured using a high-speed, 12-camera optical system and high-speed filming. Body segment rotational velocities and joint angles were determined at key points in the shot cycle from foot contact (0% of shot) to ball release (100% of shot). All players shot with less anterior trunk lean, less transverse shoulder rotation, and slower trunk-shoulder rotational velocities with the non-dominant side than the dominant side (all p < 0.05). Professional players produced crosse angular velocities 21% faster than high school or collegiate players (p < 0.05). Transverse shoulder rotation range of motion on both dominant and non-dominant and trunk rotation sides was highest in the professional players (p < 0.05). These kinematic features enable professional players to produce faster ball speeds than younger players (138 ± 7 km/h vs. 112 ± 15 km/h, respectively; p < 0.05). Less anterior lean or suboptimal rotation sequence could increase proximal shoulder forces that could contribute to injury as in other throwing sports.

Keywords: Crosse; kinematics; throwing; velocity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Key phases of the lacrosse shot used for this analysis. The stick figure represents the computer model position during these phases, 1a) Crank-back: the wind-up phase in which the shooting shoulder abducts and the trunk turns away from the target as the lead foot makes contact with the ground; 1b) Acceleration: the phase in which angular velocities of the body segments (pelvis, trunk, upper arm about the shoulder) and crosse are increased to prepare for ball release; and 1c) Follow-through; this phase represents the time at which the shooting shoulder crosses over the pelvis and body segment deceleration occurs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pelvis, trunk and, shoulder angular velocities of a high school (2a), collegiate (2b) and professional lacrosse player (2c) during a lacrosse shot. All three sample players were attack, and each generated the highest ball speeds among the players from their respective groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aggelousis N, Mavromatis G, Gourgoulis V, Pollatou E, Malliou V, Kioumourtzoglou E. Modifications of neuromuscular activity and improvement in performance of a novel motor skill. Perceptual Motor Skills. 2001;93:239–48. - PubMed
    1. Chaudhari AM, Hearn BK, Andriacchi TP. Sport-dependent variations in arm position during single-limb landing influence knee loading: Implications for anterior cruciate ligament injury. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2005;33:824–30. - PubMed
    1. Dick RW. Head protection in women’s lacrosse. US Lacrosse National Convention Program. Philadelphia, PA: US Lacrosse; 2013.
    1. Fleisig G, Chu Y, Weber A, Andrews J. Variability in baseball pitching biomechanics among various levels of competition. Sports Biomechanics. 2009;8:10–21. - PubMed
    1. Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW, Zheng N, Escamilla RF, Andrews JR. Kinematic and kinetic comparison of baseball pitching among various levels of development. Journal of Biomechanics. 1999;32:1371–5. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources