Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Jun:74:57-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 21.

Missing data in randomized controlled trials testing palliative interventions pose a significant risk of bias and loss of power: a systematic review and meta-analyses

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Missing data in randomized controlled trials testing palliative interventions pose a significant risk of bias and loss of power: a systematic review and meta-analyses

Jamilla A Hussain et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the risk posed by missing data (MD) to the power and validity of trials evaluating palliative interventions.

Study design and setting: A systematic review of MD in published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of palliative interventions in participants with life-limiting illnesses was conducted, and random-effects meta-analyses and metaregression were performed. CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE (2009-2014) were searched with no language restrictions.

Results: One hundred and eight RCTs representing 15,560 patients were included. The weighted estimate for MD at the primary endpoint was 23.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.3, 27.4). Larger MD proportions were associated with increasing numbers of questions/tests requested (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI 1.05, 1.35) and with longer study duration (OR, 1.09; 95% CI 1.02, 1.17). Meta-analysis found evidence of differential rates of MD between trial arms, which varied in direction (OR, 1.04; 95% CI 0.90, 1.20; I(2) 35.9, P = 0.001). Despite randomization, MD in the intervention arms (vs. control) were more likely to be attributed to disease progression unrelated to the intervention (OR, 1.31; 95% CI 1.02, 1.69). This was not the case for MD due to death (OR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.78, 1.08).

Conclusion: The overall proportion and differential rates and reasons for MD reduce the power and potentially introduce bias to palliative care trials.

Keywords: Differential mortality; Meta-analysis; Missing data; Palliative care; Randomized controlled trials; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA study flow diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot of the reported proportion of missing data at the primary endpoint.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot of the reported differential proportion of missing data in the intervention compared to the control arm.

References

    1. Carpenter J, Bartlett J, Kenward M. http://www.missingdata.org.uk Online: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Available at: http://missingdata.lshtm.ac.uk. Accessed December 2, 2014.
    1. Raghunathan T.E. What do we do with missing data? Some options for analysis of incomplete data. Annu Rev Public Health. 2004;25:99–117. - PubMed
    1. Panel on Handling Missing Data in Clinical Trials . National Research Council; 2010. The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. Available at: http://www.cytel.com/hs-fs/hub/1670/file-2411099288-pdf/Pdf/MissingDataN.... Accessed January 8, 2016.
    1. Preston N.J., Fayers P., Walters S.J., Pilling M., Grande G.E., Short V. Recommendations for managing missing data, attrition and response shift in palliative and end-of-life care research: part of the MORECare research method guidance on statistical issues. Palliat Med. 2013;27:899–907. - PubMed
    1. Currow D.C., Plummer J.L., Kutner J.S., Samsa G.P., Abernethy A.P. Analyzing phase III studies in hospice/palliative care. A solution that sits between intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses: the palliative-modified ITT analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012;44:595–603. English. - PubMed

MeSH terms