Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Mar;37(3):231-241.
doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2015.11.008. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

Antibody-Based Biologics and Their Promise to Combat Staphylococcus aureus Infections

Affiliations
Review

Antibody-Based Biologics and Their Promise to Combat Staphylococcus aureus Infections

William E Sause et al. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

The growing incidence of serious infections mediated by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains poses a significant risk to public health. This risk is exacerbated by a prolonged void in the discovery and development of truly novel antibiotics and the absence of a vaccine. These gaps have created renewed interest in the use of biologics in the prevention and treatment of serious staphylococcal infections. In this review, we focus on efforts towards the discovery and development of antibody-based biologic agents and their potential as clinical agents in the management of serious S. aureus infections. Recent promising data for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting anthrax and Ebola highlight the potential of antibody-based biologics as therapeutic agents for serious infections.

Keywords: MRSA; antibody; biologics; immune evasion; infectious diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. S. aureus Immune Evasion Factors Targeted by Experimental Biologic Agents
S. aureus possesses an elaborate arsenal of extracellular virulence factors that serve as targets for the current class of anti-staphylococcal biologics being developed. These targets include: (1) surface bound adhesins that promote host colonization and disruption of complement pathways, (2) immunoglobulin binding proteins (Protein A, Sbi) that bind to IgGs and prevent engagement of host immune factors, (3) surface-associated and secreted proteases (GluV8) that digest IgG antibody components and diminish effector function, (4) a family of immune-stimulatory exotoxins called superantigens (SAgs), (5) potent leukocidal toxins that kill critical classes of immune cells, and (6) immunogenic cell wall autolysins that are important for bacterial uptake into non-professional phagocytes.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Extracellular and Intracellular killing mediated by S. aureus toxins
S. aureus implements a multi-pronged strategy to kill host immune cells from both outside of the cell and from within. Extracellular cytolysis: On the surface of the host cell, S. aureus delivers pore-forming toxins that target specific host receptors and destroy the phagocyte through cell lysis. Intracellular cytolysis: S. aureus is opsonized with immunglobulins and complement, which leads to phagocytosis of a subset of this population. Intracellular bacteria then promote their survival by releasing toxins that disrupt the integrity of the phagolysosome, promote bacterial escape into the cytoplasm, and destroy the phagocyte from within. Approaches to block extracellular and intracellular cytolysis: Current biologics under development attempt to account for all facets of this strategy using molecules that opsonize the bacterium and neutralize the toxins that are responsible for causing cell death, thus disarming the bacterium from the outside and from within. With this approach, the phagocyte is preserved and S. aureus is destroyed in the phagolysosome.

Comment in

References

    1. Dantes R, Mu Y, Belflower R, Aragon D, Dumyati G, Harrison LH, et al. National burden of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, United States, 2011. JAMA internal medicine. 2013;173(21):1970–1978. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10423. PubMed PMID: 24043270. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Verkaik NJ, de Vogel CP, Boelens HA, Grumann D, Hoogenboezem T, Vink C, et al. Anti-staphylococcal humoral immune response in persistent nasal carriers and noncarriers of Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 2009;199(5):625–632. doi: 10.1086/596743. Epub 2009/02/10. PubMed PMID: 19199541. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dryla A, Prustomersky S, Gelbmann D, Hanner M, Bettinger E, Kocsis B, et al. Comparison of antibody repertoires against Staphylococcus aureus in healthy individuals and in acutely infected patients. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005;12(3):387–398. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.12.3.387-398.2005. PubMed PMID: 15753252; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1065207. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holtfreter S, Roschack K, Eichler P, Eske K, Holtfreter B, Kohler C, et al. Staphylococcus aureus carriers neutralize superantigens by antibodies specific for their colonizing strain: a potential explanation for their improved prognosis in severe sepsis. J Infect Dis. 2006;193(9):1275–1278. doi: 10.1086/503048. PubMed PMID: 16586365. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spaan AN, Surewaard BG, Nijland R, van Strijp JA. Neutrophils Versus Staphylococcus aureus: A Biological Tug of War. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2013 doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155746. Epub 2013/07/10. PubMed PMID: 23834243. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms