Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Mar;27(2):118-24.
doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000241.

Electroretinography in glaucoma diagnosis

Affiliations
Review

Electroretinography in glaucoma diagnosis

Laura J Wilsey et al. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Electrophysiological measures of vision function have for decades generated interest among glaucoma researchers and clinicians alike because of their potential to help elucidate pathophysiological processes and sequence of glaucomatous damage, as well as to offer a potential complementary metric of function that might be more sensitive than standard automated perimetry. The purpose of this article is to review the recent literature to provide an update on the role of the electroretinogram (ERG) in glaucoma diagnosis.

Recent findings: The pattern reversal ERG (PERG) and the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the cone-driven full-field, focal or multifocal ERG provide objective measures of retinal ganglion cell function and are all sensitive to glaucomatous damage. Recent studies demonstrate that a reduced PERG amplitude is predictive of subsequent visual field conversion (from normal to glaucomatous) and an increased rate of progressive retinal nerve fiber layer thinning in suspect eyes, indicating a potential role for PERG in risk stratification. Converging evidence indicates that some portion of PERG and PhNR abnormality represents a reversible aspect of dysfunction in glaucoma.

Summary: PERG and PhNR responses obtained from the central macula are capable of detecting early-stage, reversible glaucomatous dysfunction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Heckenlively JR, Arden GB. Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2006.
    1. Wachtmeister L. Oscillatory potentials in the retina: what do they reveal. Prog Retin Eye Res. 1998;17:485–521. - PubMed
    1. Sieving PA, Murayama K, Naarendorp F. Push-pull model of the primate photopic electroretinogram: a role for hyperpolarizing neurons in shaping the b-wave. Vis Neurosci. 1994;11:519–532. - PubMed
    1. Pangeni G, Lammer R, Tornow RP, et al. On- and off-response ERGs elicited by sawtooth stimuli in normal subjects and glaucoma patients. Doc Ophthalmol. 2012;124:237–248. - PubMed
    1. Gowrisankaran S, Genead MA, Anastasakis A, Alexander KR. Characteristics of late negative ERG responses elicited by sawtooth flicker. Doc Ophthalmol. 2013;126:9–19. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types