Analysis of Clinical and Pathologic Factors of Pure, Flat Epithelial Atypia on Core Needle Biopsy to Aid in the Decision of Excision or Observation
- PMID: 26722353
- PMCID: PMC4679374
- DOI: 10.7150/jca.12781
Analysis of Clinical and Pathologic Factors of Pure, Flat Epithelial Atypia on Core Needle Biopsy to Aid in the Decision of Excision or Observation
Abstract
Background: The optimal treatment of flat epithelial atypia (FEA) found on breast core needle biopsy (CNB) is controversial. We performed a retrospective review of our institutional experience with FEA to determine if excisional biopsy may be deferred.
Methods: Surgical records from 2009 to 2012 were reviewed for FEA diagnosis. After exclusion for concomitant lesions, CNBs of pure FEA were classified using a previously agreed upon descriptor of "focal" versus "prominent". Data was analyzed with the Fisher's Exact and Student-t test as appropriate.
Results: Of 71 CNBs evaluated, pure FEA was identified on 27 CNBs. Final excisional biopsy was benign in 24 of 27 cases (88%) with associated ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) in 3 of 27 cases (11%). Eighteen of 27 (67%) CNBs were classified as focal while 9 (33%) were described as prominent. Zero of the 18 focal patients had a malignancy compared to 3 of the 9 in the prominent group (0% vs 33%, p=0.02). Of the 27 pure FEA CNBs, 6 patients had a personal history of breast carcinoma, five DCIS and one invasive ductal carcinoma. No malignancies were found in the 21 patients without a personal history of breast carcinoma versus three in the patients with a positive history (0/21 v 3/6, p=0.007).
Conclusions: Our data suggests those women who have adequate sampling and sectioning of CNBs, with focal, pure FEA on pathology, and are without a personal history of breast cancer may undergo a period of imaging surveillance. Conversely, patients with a history of breast cancer or pure, prominent FEA on CNB disease should proceed to excisional biopsy.
Keywords: Columnar Cell Change with atypia; Columnar Cell Hyperplasia with Atypia.; DIN 1A; Ductal Intraepithelial Neoplasia; Pure FEA; Pure Flat Epithelial Atypia.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.
Figures
References
-
- Azzopardi JG, Ahmed A, Millis RR. Problems in breast pathology. Major Problems in Breast Pathology. 1979;11:i–xvi. 1-466. - PubMed
-
- Moinfar F, Man YG, Bratthauer GL, Ratschek M, Tavassoli FA. Genetic abnormalities in mammary ductal intraepithelial neoplasia-flat type ("clinging ductal carcinoma in situ"): a simulator of normal mammary epithelium. Cancer. 2000;88:2072–2081. - PubMed
-
- Simpson PT, Gale T, Reis-Filho JS. et al. Columnar cell lesions of the breast: the missing link in breast cancer progression? A morphological and molecular analysis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:734–746. - PubMed
-
- Tavassoli FA HH, Rosai J, Holland R, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Boecker W, Heywang Köbrunner SH, Moinfar F, Lakhani SR. Intraductal proliferative lesions. In: Tavassoli FA DP, editor. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. Lyons, France: IARC Press; 2003. pp. 63–73.
-
- Schnitt SJ, Vincent-Salomon A. Columnar cell lesions of the breast. Adv Anat Pathol. 2003;10:113–124. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
