Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Dec 24;5(4):165-82.
doi: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i4.165.

Reducing transfusion requirements in liver transplantation

Affiliations
Review

Reducing transfusion requirements in liver transplantation

Ciara I Donohue et al. World J Transplant. .

Abstract

Liver transplantation (LT) was historically associated with massive blood loss and transfusion. Over the past two decades transfusion requirements have reduced dramatically and increasingly transfusion-free transplantation is a reality. Both bleeding and transfusion are associated with adverse outcomes in LT. Minimising bleeding and reducing unnecessary transfusions are therefore key goals in the perioperative period. As the understanding of the causes of bleeding has evolved so too have techniques to minimize or reduce the impact of blood loss. Surgical "piggyback" techniques, anaesthetic low central venous pressure and haemodilution strategies and the use of autologous cell salvage, point of care monitoring and targeted correction of coagulopathy, particularly through use of factor concentrates, have all contributed to declining reliance on allogenic blood products. Pre-emptive management of preoperative anaemia and adoption of more restrictive transfusion thresholds is increasingly common as patient blood management (PBM) gains momentum. Despite progress, increasing use of marginal grafts and transplantation of sicker recipients will continue to present new challenges in bleeding and transfusion management. Variation in practice across different centres and within the literature demonstrates the current lack of clear transfusion guidance. In this article we summarise the causes and predictors of bleeding and present the evidence for a variety of PBM strategies in LT.

Keywords: Blood conservation; Coagulation; Liver transplantation; Patient blood management; Transfusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Red blood cell transfusion requirement in patients undergoing primary liver transplantation at the University Medical Centre, Groningen from 1989 to 2002. Data presented as box and whisker plots representing median, interquartile range and 5%-95% range. Both variation in transfusion and median number of RBC transfused has declined over time. From Porte et al[6] 2004. RBC: Red blood cell.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan meier survival curve demonstrating reduced survival in patients who received > 6 units red blood cell up to 36 mo post liver transplantation. From Ramos et al[13]. PRCUs: Packed red cell units.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan Meier curve representing cumulative survival with transfusion of no, 0-2 units and > 2 units of platelets. From de Boer et al[14] 2008.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Fragile rebalancing of pro and anti-haemostatic factors with limited reserves leads to increased thrombotic and bleeding tendency. From Saner et al[43] 2013. TF: Tissue factor; vWF: Von Willebrand Factor; FVIII: Factor VIII; tPA: Tissue plasminogen activator; PAI: Plasminogen activator inhibitor; ADAMTS13: A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13; AT: Antithrombin; LPS: Lipopolysaccharide.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Thromboelastography traces depicting. A: Dilutional coagulopathy with loss of endogenous thrombin generating potential, low fibrinogen and platelets seen as a typical “arrowhead” trace; B: Hypocoagulable state with prolonged R time but retention of thrombin generation; C: Normal coagulation profile; D: Hypercoagulability with a short R time, steep rate of clot formation (α angle) and increased clot MA. R: Reaction time; K: Kinetics time taken to achieve a certain level of clot strength (20 mm); MA: Maximum amplitude; G: Log derivation of the MA; EPL: Estimated percent lysis; Ly30: Lysis at 30 min; Ly60: Lysis at 60 min; CI: Coagulation index.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Schematic of thromboelastography/rotational thromboelastometry parameters. TEG: Thromboelastography; K time: Coagulation time (20-mm clot); Ly30: Lysis at 30 min; MA: Maximum amplitude; R time: Reaction time (2-mm clot); ROTEM: Rotational thromboelastometry; CFT: Clot formation time (20-mm clot); CLI: Clot lysis index; CT: Clotting time (2-mm clot); MCF: Maximum clot firmness; ML: Maximal lysis. From Mallett[37] 2015.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Viscoelastic traces depicting hyperfibrinolysis (A) on thromboelastography and (C) on rotational thromboelastometry with aprotinin thromboelastometry test (reversal of fibrinolysis with aprotinin); Viscoelastic traces depicting heparin-like effect (B) on thromboelastography and (D) on Rotational thromboelastometry with reversal of heparin-like effect on heparinase modified thromboelastometry. APTEM: Aprotinin thromboelastometry; HEPTEM: Heparinase modified thromboelastometry; INTEM: Intrinsic thromboelastometry; CT: Clotting time; CFT: Clot formation time; A10: Clot firmness (amplitude) at 10 min; MCF: Maximum clot firmness; ML: Maximum lysis.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Pyramid of therapy in coagulopathy with sequence of hemostatic therapeutic interventions (from base to tip). Ca: Calcium; Hb: Haemoglobin; TXA: Tranexamic acid; EACA: Epsilon aminocaproic acid; FC: Fibrinogen concentrate; Cryo: Cryoprecipitate; rFVII: Recombinant activated factor VII; FXIII: Factor XIII. From Görlinger et al[79] 2006.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Rate of blood loss (mL/min) in thrombocytopenic pigs with an induced haemorrhagic liver injury infused with fibrinogen concentrate, platelet concentrate or saline. Lowest rate of blood loss seen in pigs infused with fibrinogen concentrate. aP < 0.05 fibrinogen vs platelet group, cP < 0.05 fibrinogen vs saline group, eP < 0.05 platelet vs saline group. From Velik-Salchner et al[103] 2007.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Effect of plasma dilution and factor deficiency on thrombin generation and fibrin clot formation. Representative curves of tissue factor - induced thrombin generation (A-C) and fibrin clot formation (D-F) of undiluted normal plasma (undil.), 5 × diluted plasma (dil.), and plasma from patient taking oral anticoagulants (OAC, INR = 4). Effects of supplementing diluted plasma with fibrinogen concentrate (+ FC): Increase in clot strength with no effect on thrombin generation (B, E). Effects of supplementing diluted plasma with prothrombin complex concentrate (+ PCC): Increase in thrombin generation but no effect on clot strength (C, F). From Schols[105] 2010. OAC: Oral anticoagulatnts; INR: International normalized ratio.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Blood transfusion during liver transplantation per case: Bar plots of red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma by year. 1Indicates a significant difference from the 2000-2002 value at a significance level of P = 0.05 based on the Wald t-test for the respective regression coefficient with adjustments for age, gender, baseline weight and height. FFP: Fresh frozen plasma; n: Samples size; RBC: Red blood cells. From Hevesi et al[125] 2009.

References

    1. Massicotte L, Denault AY, Beaulieu D, Thibeault L, Hevesi Z, Nozza A, Lapointe R, Roy A. Transfusion rate for 500 consecutive liver transplantations: experience of one liver transplantation center. Transplantation. 2012;93:1276–1281. - PubMed
    1. Hannaman MJ, Hevesi ZG. Anesthesia care for liver transplantation. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2011;25:36–43. - PubMed
    1. Ozier Y, Pessione F, Samain E, Courtois F. Institutional variability in transfusion practice for liver transplantation. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:671–679. - PubMed
    1. Bismuth H, Castaing D, Ericzon BG, Otte JB, Rolles K, Ringe B, Sloof M. Hepatic transplantation in Europe. First Report of the European Liver Transplant Registry. Lancet. 1987;2:674–676. - PubMed
    1. Showstack J, Katz PP, Lake JR, Brown RS, Dudley RA, Belle S, Wiesner RH, Zetterman RK, Everhart J. Resource utilization in liver transplantation: effects of patient characteristics and clinical practice. NIDDK Liver Transplantation Database Group. JAMA. 1999;281:1381–1386. - PubMed