Women in academic surgery: why is the playing field still not level?
- PMID: 26723836
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.036
Women in academic surgery: why is the playing field still not level?
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to explore career satisfaction and advancement for women in academic surgery.
Methods: A 48-item web-based survey was emailed to women surgeons in academic centers across Canada, exploring career advancement, family planning, mentorship, discrimination, and career satisfaction.
Results: The survey response rate was 38% (81 of 212); 18% of participants felt they experienced gender discrimination in medical school, 36% in residency, 12% in fellowship, and 41% as staff surgeons. More than half felt that their gender had played a role in the career challenges they faced. Responses to open-ended questions suggested that many surgeons struggled to balance their academic careers with family life. Despite this, participants rated their career satisfaction very highly.
Conclusions: There remain ongoing challenges for women in academic surgery including lack of gender equality, appropriate mentorship, and accommodations for surgeons with families. Continued advancement of women in academic surgery is dependent on addressing these concerns.
Keywords: Academic; Gender; Surgeons; Women.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Reply to "Women in academic surgery: why is the playing field still not level?" Appearing in the American Journal of Surgery, Feb. 2016, volume 211, number 2.Am J Surg. 2016 Aug;212(2):366. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 May 26. Am J Surg. 2016. PMID: 27312958 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
