Number and size of lymph nodes and node metastases in rectal carcinomas
- PMID: 2672395
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00590909
Number and size of lymph nodes and node metastases in rectal carcinomas
Abstract
Assessment of lymphatic spread is an important factor in staging rectal cancer. Knowledge of the presumed number and size of metastases present is essential before assessment of the accuracy of preoperative visualization of node metastases can be undertaken. We examined the lymph nodes of 196 patients with rectal carcinoma. Among 4985 lymph nodes, 586 metastases were found. Ninety-eight patients had metastases in pararectal nodes and in nodes along the superior rectal artery. These nodes are potentially visible by ultrasound. In 31 of these patients (32%), all metastases were 5 mm or less and in 8 cases (8%) 2 mm or less. These small nodes are difficult to see on ultrasound. We also found significant relationships between depth of invasion, grade of differentiation and lymphatic spread. These data suggest that a careful histological search for small metastases should be undertaken to avoid false-negative lymph node findings.
Similar articles
-
Endosonography of pararectal lymph nodes. In vitro and in vivo evaluation.Dis Colon Rectum. 1990 Oct;33(10):863-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02051923. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990. PMID: 2209276
-
The size of regional lymph nodes does not correlate with the presence or absence of metastasis in lymph nodes in rectal cancer.J Surg Oncol. 1993 Dec;54(4):252-4. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930540414. J Surg Oncol. 1993. PMID: 8255087
-
Diagnostic utility of endoscopic ultrasonography for preoperative rectal cancer staging estimation.Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1996 Feb;26(1):30-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jjco.a023175. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1996. PMID: 8551664
-
[Histopathologic examination of rectal carcinoma].Zentralbl Chir. 1999;124(5):408-12. Zentralbl Chir. 1999. PMID: 10420526 Review. German.
-
The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).Ceska Gynekol. 2019 Winter;84(1):40-48. Ceska Gynekol. 2019. PMID: 31213057 Review. English.
Cited by
-
Performance of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for staging rectal cancer nodes: can the initial promising results be reproduced?Eur Radiol. 2014 Feb;24(2):371-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3016-6. Epub 2013 Sep 20. Eur Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24051676
-
Evolving treatment strategies for colorectal cancer: a critical review of current therapeutic options.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan 28;20(4):877-87. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i4.877. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24574762 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preoperative combined treatment with radiation, intraluminal hyperthermia, and 5-fluorouracil suppositories for patients with rectal cancer.Surg Today. 1993;23(12):1043-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00309091. Surg Today. 1993. PMID: 8118116 Clinical Trial.
-
Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr 21;20(15):4244-55. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4244. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24764662 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lymph node staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients with and without neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy: histomorphologic analysis.World J Surg. 2002 May;26(5):584-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0271-5. Epub 2002 Feb 19. World J Surg. 2002. PMID: 12098049
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources