[Diagnostic aids in acute appendicitis]
- PMID: 2672495
[Diagnostic aids in acute appendicitis]
Abstract
Acute appendicitis is usually diagnosed solely on clinical grounds. This results in a 15-30% incidence of unnecessary laparotomies and contributes to a perforation rate of 20-35%. The accuracies of eleven diagnostic aids for appendicitis are reviewed. The white blood cell count and straight x-ray of the abdomen are very unreliable. Four other methods, viz leucocyte scintigraphy, peritoneal lavage, barium swallow and scoring systems have not yet been sufficiently investigated. CT scanning may be useful in difficult cases. Four methods have a proven value and are recommended: Ultrasound scanning, computer assessment, laparoscopy and barium enema. Each of the latter are better than clinical assessment alone and can reduce both negative laparotomy rates and the incidence of appendicular perforation. Unaided clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis is no longer acceptable.
Similar articles
-
Aids in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.Br J Surg. 1989 Aug;76(8):774-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800760803. Br J Surg. 1989. PMID: 2527580 Review.
-
[A high degree of accuracy is possible in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Laboratory tests, ultrasonography and computerized tomography are of great value].Lakartidningen. 1999 Jun 23;96(25):3058-61. Lakartidningen. 1999. PMID: 10418251 Review. Swedish.
-
[Complementary tests in acute appendicitis].Rev Prat. 1992 Mar 15;42(6):689-92. Rev Prat. 1992. PMID: 1534630 French.
-
[Effect of new technologies on diagnosis and therapy of acute appendicitis].Praxis (Bern 1994). 2002 Feb 13;91(7):275-84. doi: 10.1024/0369-8394.91.7.275. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2002. PMID: 11883363 German.
-
Impact of adjunctive testing on the diagnosis and clinical course of patients with acute appendicitis.Am J Surg. 1993 Dec;166(6):660-4; discussion 664-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80675-0. Am J Surg. 1993. PMID: 8273845 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical