Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1989 Aug 7;151(32):2012-6.

[Diagnostic aids in acute appendicitis]

[Article in Danish]
  • PMID: 2672495
Review

[Diagnostic aids in acute appendicitis]

[Article in Danish]
J Hoffmann et al. Ugeskr Laeger. .

Abstract

Acute appendicitis is usually diagnosed solely on clinical grounds. This results in a 15-30% incidence of unnecessary laparotomies and contributes to a perforation rate of 20-35%. The accuracies of eleven diagnostic aids for appendicitis are reviewed. The white blood cell count and straight x-ray of the abdomen are very unreliable. Four other methods, viz leucocyte scintigraphy, peritoneal lavage, barium swallow and scoring systems have not yet been sufficiently investigated. CT scanning may be useful in difficult cases. Four methods have a proven value and are recommended: Ultrasound scanning, computer assessment, laparoscopy and barium enema. Each of the latter are better than clinical assessment alone and can reduce both negative laparotomy rates and the incidence of appendicular perforation. Unaided clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis is no longer acceptable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources