Association between spending on social protection and tuberculosis burden: a global analysis
- PMID: 26725446
- PMCID: PMC4834192
- DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00401-6
Association between spending on social protection and tuberculosis burden: a global analysis
Abstract
Background: The End TB Strategy places great emphasis on increasing social protection and poverty alleviation programmes. However, the role of social protection on controlling tuberculosis has not been examined fully. We analysed the association between social protection spending and tuberculosis prevalence, incidence, and mortality globally.
Methods: We used publicly available data from WHO's Global Tuberculosis Programme for tuberculosis burden in terms of yearly incidence, prevalence, and mortality per 100,000 people, and social protection data from the International Labour Organization (ILO), expressed as the percentage of national gross domestic product (GDP) spent on social protection programmes (excluding health). Data from ILO were from 146 countries covering the years between 2000 and 2012. We used descriptive assessments to examine levels of social protection and tuberculosis burden for each country, then used these assessments to inform our fully adjusted multivariate regression models. Our models controlled for economic output, adult HIV prevalence, health expenditure, population density, the percentage of foreign-born residents, and the strength of the national tuberculosis treatment programme, and also incorporated a country-level fixed effect to adjust for clustering of datapoints within countries.
Findings: Overall, social protection spending levels were inversely associated with tuberculosis prevalence, incidence, and mortality. For a country spending 0% of their GDP on social protection, moving to spending 1% of their GDP was associated with a change of -18·33 per 100,000 people (95% CI -32·10 to -4·60; p=0·009) in prevalence, -8·16 per 100,000 people (-16·00 to -0·27; p=0·043) in incidence, and -5·48 per 100,000 people (-9·34 to -1·62; p=0·006) in mortality. This association was mitigated at higher levels of social protection spending, and lost significance when more than 11% of GDP was spent.
Interpretation: Our findings suggest that investments in social protection could contribute to a reduced tuberculosis burden, especially in countries that are investing a small proportion of their GDP in this area. However, further research is needed to support these ecological associations.
Funding: National Institutes of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Science (University of California, Los Angeles [CA, USA] Clinical and Translational Science Institute).
Copyright © 2016 World Health Organization. Published by Elsevier Ltd/Inc/BV. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Fighting poverty to prevent tuberculosis.Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Apr;16(4):395-6. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00434-X. Epub 2015 Dec 23. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016. PMID: 26725447 No abstract available.
References
-
- World Health Organization . Global TB Report 2014. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2014.
-
- World Health Organization . The Global Plan to Stop TB. Geneva, Switzerland: 2006.
-
- World Health Assembly Secretariat . Global strategy and targets for tuberculosis prevention, care and control after 2015. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2014.
-
- ILO. Social Protection Floors Recommendation. Geneva: 2012.
-
- Lonnroth K, Jaramillo E, Williams BG, Dye C, Raviglione M. Drivers of tuberculosis epidemics: the role of risk factors and social determinants. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(12):2240. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
