Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan 4:6:18597.
doi: 10.1038/srep18597.

The basal function of teleost prolactin as a key regulator on ion uptake identified with zebrafish knockout models

Affiliations

The basal function of teleost prolactin as a key regulator on ion uptake identified with zebrafish knockout models

Yuqin Shu et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Prolactin (PRL) is an anterior pituitary hormone with a broad range of functions. Its ability to stimulate lactogenesis, maternal behavior, growth and development, osmoregulation, and epithelial ion transport has been reported in many vertebrates. In our present study, we have targeted the zebrafish prl locus via transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs). Two independent targeted mutant lines with premature termination of the putative sequence of PRL peptides were generated. All prl-deficient zebrafish progeny died at 6-16 days post-fertilization stage (dpf) in egg water. However, the prl-deficient larvae thrived and survived through adulthood in brackish water (5175 mg/L ocean salts), without obvious defects in somatic growth or reproduction. When raised in egg water, the expression levels of certain key Na(+)/Cl(-) cotransporters in the gills and Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase subunits, Na(+)/H(+) exchangers and Na(+)/Cl(-) transporters in the pronephros of prl-deficient larvae were down-regulated at 5 dpf, which caused Na(+)/K(+)/Cl(-) uptake defects in the mutant fish at 6 dpf. Our present results demonstrate that the primary function of zebrafish prl is osmoregulation via governing the uptake and homeostasis of Na(+), K(+) and Cl(-). Our study provides valuable evidence to understand the mechanisms of PRL function better through both phylogenetic and physiological perspectives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Inactivation of the zebrafish prl gene.
(A) Schematic representation of wild-type (prl+/+, top) and two lines of TALEN targeted prl alleles (center and bottom). Exons are represented by red boxes with the targeted region in exon 1 shown as a blue box. TALEN arms are marked by an underline in the targeted region of the wild-type locus. (B) Schematic representation of the putative peptide of wild-type PRL (top) and the two mutated PRL peptides from the targeted alleles (center and bottom). (C) Genomic DNA PCR assay of 5 dpf larvae resulting from a cross between prl heterozygotes. (D) Western blot of the pituitary samples from wild-type (left) and prl-deficient (right) adults at 100 dpf. WT, wild-type; TALEN, transcription activator-like effector nuclease; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; Dpf, days post-fertilization.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Prl-deficient zebrafish can survive only in brackish water.
(A) The curve of survival rates of wild-type and prl-deficient larvae in regular zebrafish egg water and system water (FW, 60–175 mg/L IOS) or brackish water (BW, 5060–5175 mg/L IOS) (n = 100). (B) The general morphological observations of wild-type larvae (B1-B5) and prl-deficient larvae (B6-B10) during 4–8 dpf. The prl-deficient larvae exhibit defects in swim bladder inflation after 5 dpf (B8-B10), curved bodies at 6 dpf (B8), and obvious edema at 7–8 dpf (B9, B10). (C) Major ion contents were measured with wild-type larvae and prl-deficient larvae at 6 dpf cultured in FW and BW. Cation contents were assessed by the inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) method and chloride assessed by chloride colorimetric assay kit. *significant difference (P < 0.05). At least twenty embryos were pooled as a sample for ion content analysis. (D) Representative healthy wild-type (left) and prl-deficient (right) adults cultured in brackish water at 100 dpf. IOS, Instant Ocean salts; dpf, days post-fertilization. E) Assessment of synthesized wild-type prl mRNA injection based on statistics of gas bladders inflated rates of wild-type larvae, prl-deficient larvae and prl-deficient larvae injected with prl mRNA at 5 dpf.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Expression patterns of ionocyte progenitor markers.
(A–H) Expression patterns of foxi3a (A,B) forkhead box I3a, an early marker for HR cells) and foxi3b (C,D) forkhead box I3b, an early marker for NaR cells) in wild-type (left) and prl-deficient (right) larvae at 24 hpf and ca2 (E,F) carbonic anhydrase II, a marker for HR cells) and atp1b1b (G,H) ATPase, Na+/K+ transporting, beta 1b polypeptide, a marker for NaR cells) in wild-type (left) and prl-deficient (right) larvae at 48 hpf. (I) counts of foxi3a, foxi3b and atp1b1b expression cells based on in situ results. (J) Expression levels of foxi3a and foxi3b (at 24 hpf), ca2 and atp1b1b (at 48 hpf) in total tissue from wild-type and prl-deficient larvae in regular zebrafish egg water via qRT-PCR assay. *significant difference (P < 0.05). Arrows, pronephric ducts; The qRT-PCR result shown here is the representative of the results obtained in two separate experiments. For in situ hybridization results, at least 17 embryos/genotype were analyzed in two separated experiments. For cell counts, 8 embryos were analyzed in two groups (N = 8).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Expression patterns of ion transporters and sodium accumulation in gills of prl-deficient larvae.
(A–F) Whole mount in situ hybridization assay of solute carrier family 12, member 10, tandem duplicate 2 (slc12a10.2) and ATPase, Na/K transporting, α 1a polypeptide, tandem duplicate 5 (atp1a1a.5) expression in gills of wild-type larvae (A,D), prl-deficient larvae (B,E) and prl -deficient larvae injected with prl mRNA (C,F) at 5 dpf in regular zebrafish egg water. (G) counts of atp1a1a.5 and slc12a10.2 expression cells in gills based on in situ results. (H) Expression levels of atp1a1a.5 and slc12a10.2 in head tissue from wild-type, prl-deficient larvae and prl-deficient larvae injected with prl mRNA at 5 dpf in regular zebrafish egg water via qRT-PCR assay. (I,J) Sodium green staining in gills of living larvae of wild-type (I) and prl-deficient larvae (J) at 6 dpf in regular zebrafish egg water (dorsal views). (a,b) different letters in two group mean significant difference (P < 0.05). The qRT-PCR result shown here is the representative of the results obtained in two separate experiments. For in situ hybridization results, at least 12 embryos/genotype were analyzed in two separated experiments. For cell counts, 8 embryos were analyzed in two groups (N = 8).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Expression patterns of ion transporters in pronephros of prl-deficient larvae.
(A–C) Whole mount in situ hybridization assay of atp1a1a.5 expression in pronephros of wild-type larvae (A), prl-deficient larvae (B) and prl-deficient larvae injected with prl mRNA (C) at 5 dpf in regular zebrafish egg water. (D–F) Whole mount in situ hybridization assay of solute carrier family 12, member 3 (slc12a3) expression in pronephros of wild-type larvae (D), prl-deficient larvae (E) and prl-deficient larvae injected with prl mRNA (F) at 5 dpf in regular zebrafish egg water. (G–I) Whole mount in situ hybridization assay of solute carrier family 9, subfamily A, member 3, tandem duplicate 2 (slc9a3.2) expression in pronephros of wild-type larvae (G), prl-deficient larvae(H) and prl-deficient larvae injected with prl mRNA (I) at 5 dpf in regular zebrafish egg water. Insets in A-I: the amplified images of the pronephros. (J) Expression levels of atp1a1a.5, slc12a3, and slc9a3.2 in decapitated larvae body samples from wild-type, prl-deficient larvae and prl-deficient larvae injected with prl mRNA at 5 dpf in regular zebrafish egg water assayed via qRT-PCR assay. (K) Expression levels of atp1a1a.5 in total tissue from wild-type and prl-deficient larvae at 5 dpf in regular zebrafish egg water assayed via qRT-PCR assay. *significant difference (P < 0.05). (a–c) different letters in two group mean significant difference (P < 0.05). Arrows, pronephric ducts; The qRT-PCR result shown here is the representative of the results obtained in two separate experiments. For in situ hybridization results, at least 12 embryos/genotype were analyzed in two separated experiments.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Analyses of Ca2+ uptake and bone formation in prl-deficient larvae.
(A–C) Expression patterns of transient receptor potential family, vanilloid type 6 channel (trpv6) in gills of wild-type larvae (A), prl-deficient larvae (B) prl-deficient larvae embryos injected with wild-type prl mRNA larvae (C) at 5 dpf in regular zebrafish egg water. (D) qRT-PCR assay of trpv6 expression levels in the head tissue from wild-type, prl-deficient larvae and prl-deficient larvae injected with prl mRNA at 5 dpf in regular zebrafish egg water. (E,F) Expression patterns of stanniocalcin 1 (stc1) in the corpuscles of Stannius of wild-type (E) and prl-deficient larvae (F) at 5 dpf in regular zebrafish egg water. (G–L) Bone pattern assayed with the Alizarin staining for the wild type control larvae (G,H), prl-deficient larvae (I,J) in hypotonic water with low level Ca2+ added (salinity: 675 mg IOS/L, Ca2+: 71.68 mg/L), and prl-deficient larvae (K,L) in hypotonic water with high level Ca2+ added (salinity: 675 mg IOS/L, Ca2+: 143.36 mg/L) at 11 dpf. (G,I,K) dorsal views; (H,J,L) lateral views. (a,b) different letters between two groups mean significant difference (P < 0.05). Dpf, days post-fertilization; qRT-PCR, quantitative real time RT-PCR; IOS, Instant ocean salts. The qRT-PCR result shown here is the representative of the results obtained in two separate experiments. For whole mount in situ hybridization, at least 16 embryos/genotype were analyzed in two separated experiments.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Riddle O., Bates R. W. & Dykshorn S. W. The preparation, identification and assay of prolactin - A hormone of the anterior pituitary. Am J Physiol 105, 191–216 (1933).
    1. Ormandy C. J. et al. Null mutation of the prolactin receptor gene produces multiple reproductive defects in the mouse. Genes & development 11, 167–178 (1997). - PubMed
    1. Wennbo H. et al. Activation of the prolactin receptor but not the growth hormone receptor is important for induction of mammary tumors in transgenic mice. The Journal of clinical investigation 100, 2744–2751 (1997). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ben-Jonathan N., LaPensee C. R. & LaPensee E. W. What can we learn from rodents about prolactin in humans? Endocr Rev 29, 1–41 (2008). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Horseman N. D. & Gregerson K. A. Prolactin actions. J Mol Endocrinol 52, R95–106 (2014). - PubMed

Publication types