Immersion versus contact technique in the measurement of axial length by ultrasound
- PMID: 2672694
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1989.tb00732.x
Immersion versus contact technique in the measurement of axial length by ultrasound
Abstract
The axial length was measured by A-scan in 60 cataractous patients using a non-contact (immersion) and a contact technique. The mean axial length was found to be 23.49 mm with the immersion technique and 23.35 mm with the contact technique, using the same Sonometrics transducer probe. The difference of 0.14 mm (+/- 0.19) was significant at the 0.01 level. The difference should be taken into account when evaluating the accuracy of IOL calculation, and may call for different empirical corrections of the axial length with different ultrasonic equipment.
Similar articles
-
[Intraocular lens calculation and ultrasound biometry: immersion and contact procedures].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1998 Sep;213(3):161-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1034967. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1998. PMID: 9793914 Clinical Trial. German.
-
[Comparative study of the biometric measurements made by immersion and contact techniques].Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2006 Nov-Dec;69(6):875-80. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492006000600017. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2006. PMID: 17273683 Portuguese.
-
Immersion B-guided versus contact A-mode biometry for accurate measurement of axial length and intraocular lens power calculation in siliconized eyes.Retina. 2011 Feb;31(2):262-5. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181e17f39. Retina. 2011. PMID: 20829737
-
[Comparison of contact and immersion techniques of ultrasound biometry].Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2008 Jan;64(1):16-8. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2008. PMID: 18225494 Czech.
-
[Accuracy of immersion B-scan ultrasound biometry in high myopic patients with cataract].Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;50(1):32-6. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2014. PMID: 24709131 Chinese.
Cited by
-
Outcomes of cataract operations in extreme high axial myopia.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;254(9):1811-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3414-y. Epub 2016 Jun 16. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27313161
-
Measurement of optic disc size: equivalence of methods to correct for ocular magnification.Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Jun;82(6):643-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.6.643. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998. PMID: 9797665 Free PMC article.
-
Refractive outcomes comparison between the Lenstar LS 900® optical biometry and immersion A-scan ultrasound.Int Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;35(4):459-66. doi: 10.1007/s10792-014-9970-4. Epub 2014 Jul 15. Int Ophthalmol. 2015. PMID: 25024102 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of axial length, anterior chamber depth and intraocular lens power between IOLMaster and ultrasound in normal, long and short eyes.PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0194273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194273. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29543854 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of ocular biometry measurements by applanation and immersion A-scan techniques.J Curr Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb 9;27(3-4):110-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2015.12.002. eCollection 2015 Sep-Dec. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27239588 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous